by Darius Kazemi, May 4 2019
Found a typo
The technical content
This document reports an error in RFC-107. On page 7, an “RTS” should be an “STR”. Curiously, this error is not present in the current version of RFC-107 that is on file! This suggests that it was corrected at some point and then entered into the permanent record that we have today.
Amusingly, this correction contains two errors in it! “Catagories” is a misspelling, and it says it updates RFC-106, when in fact it updates RFC-107 as in the title!
The RFC Editors keep a record of every error in every RFC in their Errata. This is because RFCs are considered permanent once published, so you can't go back and edit them, you can only provide error reports.
I have, in fact, filed an Errata report for this early Errata.