Entropy Embrace

A blog about noise.

Rusty's Thoughts

“Slow, very slow; with a slowness that banishes every sensation of movement; like the infinite, enveloping slowness of gigantic waves; to the point of taking the look of a waveless, nearly immobile sea of shit” – Walter Marchetti


Walter Marchetti (1931-2015): a composer who hated music, who saw its osteoporosified structures betray sound's possibilities.


A world-travelling Italian, Marchetti is best known for co-founding with Juan Hidalgo the Spain-based ZAJ Group, an experimental collective that operated throughout the 1960s & 1970s. The group—loose in both membership & aims—initially was musically focused, trying to extend American composer John Cage's aims in breaking down traditional Western boundaries between music, noise, sounds, & silence. With the addition of the writer José Luis Castillejo, however, ZAJ moved to a more interdisciplinary focus. I hesitate to say “arts” focus because ZAJ practitioners are the spiritual cousins of Fluxus & other anti-art impulses. As with Fluxus' “happenings,” ZAJ focused much of its creative energy on surreal, humorous, self-reflexive performance pieces that tried to shatter the divide between life & art. A good example is Tomás Marco's “Das Augenlicht (homage to anton webern)” translated in ZAJ Sampler:

Close your right eye Open your right eye

Close your left eye Open your left eye

Close both eyes Open both eyes

I don't know if Marco ever performed this piece or if it even needed to be performed. As an idea, it works: the ridiculously simple action both pokes fun at artistic pretensions & re-inserts us into our bodies, paying attention to the most simple, taken-for-granted actions. These are also the central impulses in Marchetti's aesthetics.


“Music always refers to itself and to nothing else, and this tautology satisfies everybody, even musicians.” To Marchetti, music is a narcissistic monster. It prevents us from being fully embodied in the present. It offers only a mirror for musicians in love with their creations, in love with their El Dorado-ified pasts.


We detect once again the philosophical presence of John Cage & Fluxus, especially in the notion that art commandeers our attention, diverting it from life's rich multiplicity. As Marchetti writes in “Veils of Maya”: “Music appropriates the time of others, and the ear hears nothing but its own enslavement.” These echoes make sense: Marchetti knew Cage personally & participated in performances such 1978's Il Treno di John Cage. However, we must be careful to not see his work simply as an extension of Cagean concerns.

Cuz Marchetti is punk as fuck too. Disgust & negation are the engines of his mind. Considering his acidic humor, his penchant for scatology, & his insistence that this world cannot be redeemed, Cage's brand of hopeful anarchism doesn't come to mind. No, I see Marchetti's compadres in later Noisicians such as the Haters with their ritualistic entropy-embraces.


“Sounds, in my music, are the very last thing: non-essential and empty.”

Wait, what? A composer who says that sounds are non-essential to their music? Surely, Marchetti is having a bit of fun at our expense here. Yet I'm convinced that he's also quite serious.

To return to Cage, or as Marchetti wrote, “my cage”: Cage worries that we no longer listen to sounds, but rather only the relationships between them. Marchetti is obsessed by this too: “We spend our lives listening—re-listening—to what we have always already listened to, and more than anything else at listening what others tell us to listen to.” But while Cage wants us to open our ears to the sounds that surround us, Marchetti playfully advocates for a particular kind of deafness.

Marchetti repeatedly paints himself as the “deaf” composer in his writings. My favorite instance: “When I was young, I wasn't shrewd enough to close my ears in time.” Marchetti's variety of deafness is volunteering to no longer listen, a choice to isolate one's ears.

But he's not suggesting that we live in a soundless world. Instead, he's advocating for a detachment from sounds: “My ears betray no emotion in the presence of sounds; they seem content simply to be present.” Involvement with sounds means we'll inevitably inject meaning into them, separating them from their ambiguous, complex immediacy. José Luis Castillejo, Marchetti's ZAJ compadre, argues that Marchetti deliberately impoverished his aesthetics so as to maintain a non-interventionst stance towards sounds. As Castillejo writes, “Because only in the immediate experience of sound can music be realized as free as a music that does not sound like something to somebody.” Marchetti is working towards a world where sounds are allowed to be themselves.


How to describe this music? Here are some attempts:

Nei Mari Del Sud. Musica in Secca: Pianos drowning in Nyquil. Dried salamis of notes hanging in a goopher-dusted sunset.

Birds of Paradise: In the COVID19-quarantine slowdown, songbirds have become more prominent in my neighborhood. Listening to “Birds of Paradise” places me in my backyard, weeding, listening to bird calls weave together. My pet guinea pigs are great fans too. When I play it, they grow still, listening intently with cocked heads. Marchetti transports us—human & guinea pigs—to a pre-music sound realm.

Bless me, Marchetti, for I have sinned, describing your music in this way. Every word I write is another tombstone, another record of a dead present, a gift that I have refused. Sorry, but I'm addicted to graves.


Marchetti's writings are also thrilling: they are aphoristically ponderous, cruelly ironic, & undeniably funny. They are seismographs of a mind ripping its own ego apart. While I don't agree with all of Marchetti's points, I find him to be inspiring because he's an artist questioning the validity of existing structures while avoiding the pitfalls of self-satisfaction. Below I've included one of my favorite Marchetti's writings, “As in a Diary.”

Marchetti's “As in a Diary”

Any place at all: any moment of the day; any phrase, spoken, written, or read; thoughts, dreams, desires, ideal or unknown events, summoned and dismissed in an instant, in accord with each individual's need for poetry .................. , ..................

Having nothing to do at the moment, nor at any other moment, nor at any other moment .................. , ..................

...and there are so many desires... Unimaginable abundance, splendid opportunities... .................. , ..................

Mere simultaneity sometimes takes the upper hand .................. , ..................

The listeners only play the role which we musicians allow them to play .................. , ..................

But this music could also be an experiment which has led to no results .................. , ..................

Sounds that repeat themselves with potent, disagreeable rhythms of majestic montony and uniformity. .................. , ..................

It's true that I compose, but really I'm always thinking about something else .................. , ..................

Bringing yourself to a halt at the threshold of music .................. , ..................

To make or not to make music? What finer formulation of a quandary in absolute existentialism? But what it mainly reveals—even more than it reveals the utter ambivalence of people who make music—is all the uncertainty in setting up sounds that aim to convince a listener. .................. , ..................

Every sound is equivalent to ever other sound .................. , ..................

It is in the errors that you find something interesting .................. , ..................

I stopped believing my own ears quite some time ago .................. , ..................

This continuum is so perfect, and the illusion so absolute, as to seem to be the very essence of music .................. , ..................

Do you think of the era of human life on earth as a long or short period for music? .................. , ..................

A reassuring vision of music would doubtless be preferable .................. , ..................

I decided quite some time ago to abandon this acoustic desert of always identical sounds, fixed once and for all and forever consigned to this pseudo-eternity known as music .................. , ..................

We spend out time and our lives listening—re-listening—to what we have always already listened to, and more than anything else at listening to what others tell us to listen to .................. , ..................

Music which invokes a forgotten El Dorado (which never existed, was never experienced, never conceived) .................. , ..................

Nothing is true, everything is permitted .................. , ..................

The notion of first this sound, then that other one, makes very little sense; before and after, this and that, is exactly the same thing in music. Pure movement, or moving .................. , ..................

Reality, in music, is the reality of reality .................. , ..................

This music tramps on and on and on without conviction .................. , ..................

The simple succession of sounds: each is as good as the other .................. , ..................

There has always been a kind of deafness in my way of approaching music .................. , ..................

What compels us to plunge towards the nearest spectable is perhaps the need to perform a symbolic act of self-exhibition, or a final gesture of unconditional surrender .................. , ..................

The movement ought to be vague, without tension: neither too slow nor troppo mosso; like a music with no horizon .................. , ..................

The area in which I move is once again deserted .................. , ..................

Set a 'C' on fire: that's the first thing to do .................. , ..................

The problem, perhaps, is now to get out of it all without soiling yourself too much .................. , ..................

That sinister band of men who perpetuate this state of affairs .................. , ..................

Before music dies, I'd like to harvest the final sound .................. , ..................

The survival of any and every sound always and only depends on the will of the composer .................. , ..................

I have not fallen victim to the sounds which are hammered into my head .................. , ..................

Musicians closed their ears to the world quite some time ago .................. , ..................

Slow, very slow; with a slowness that banishes every sensation of movement; like the inifite, enveloping slowness of gigantic waves; to the point of taking the look of a waveless, nearly immobile sea of shit; without movement, like music that dilates the present; music has straight and immobile as death, or like a yellowish, pestilential miasma that heaves on the surface of a cesspit, as though the present were indefinite; music no less menacing that the world that wraps around us; fleetingly luminous music, streakeed by manifold colours: bile yellow, blood red, rigor mortis blue, the orange of suffocated rage .................. , ..................

The artist has the wonderful ability to look at himself in the mirror without ever throwing up .................. , ..................

Yes, it's true: shit is the blood of musicians .................. , ..................

The scenarions depicted by music show nothing but the passage of time .................. , ..................

Moving from one sound to another strikes me as already the most radical undertaking of all .................. , ..................

The melodic line is never static .................. , ..................

Sometimes irritated, sometimes in ecstasy, sometimes bored, sometimes absent-minded .................. , ..................

My activity limits itself to transmitting weak signals of identification .................. , ..................

The things that take place in a world of diversity are always flanked by a touch of surrealism .................. , ..................

A warm sound in a soft and changeable light that's veined with red, black, yellow and green .................. , ..................

Tension abates. The sounds spread out and grow ever more distant .................. , ..................

More blue is simply more blue than less blue .................. , ..................

Music! Lethal dust for the mind .................. , ..................

There's no place to go; every place seems by now to be the same place .................. , ..................

A positive utopia: an imaginary place of perennial vacationing .................. , ..................

So much music, music, music! .................. , ..................

No one talks and wherever you look you always see the same worried, intent expression: like the look on the faces of people who are listening to music .................. , ..................

Even in its most sublime and complex manifestations, music is a very simple thing: a constant return of formulas .................. , ..................

The past doesn't interest me .................. , ..................

The possibility of interpreting things depends on accepting this crazy proposition as normal .................. , ..................

Entering time in depth. Slowing down physiological time .................. , ..................

Music always refers to itself and to nothing else; and this tautology satisfies everybody, even musicians .................. , ..................

Time passes slowly, and confused .................. , ..................

Disabled sounds are the ones that present themselves in perfect physical conditions .................. , ..................

Lying in the sun is a marvellously antisocial activity, since it's an utterly passive and antiproductive occupation .................. , ..................

This music has no end, but likewise no beginning .................. , ..................

The only reality we owe is the one we owe to our dreams .................. , ..................

For me it's enough to sit in the sun, and to breathe .................. , ..................

Under favorable circumstances, and in the light of the sun .................. , ..................

Music that demands a reclining position: one simple stretches out in the sun .................. , ..................

I always find it difficult to locate sounds without the help of a map .................. , ..................

Slate-blue .................. , ..................

The intervals between one sound and another are like a continuously active (excited) field. Empty space comes alive .................. , ..................

Now that we are close to the end, music seems to quicken our steps .................. , ..................

A sound within a sound .................. , ..................

Music was quick to turn itself into a commonplace, in hopes of being bearable .................. , ..................

One doesn't get bored in the sun, one bathes in the source of time .................. , ..................

I have always found music to resemble the site of an archaeological excavation: an investigation into something which is no longer there .................. , ..................

It is not an attempt to preserve a world on which I long ago turned my back .................. , ..................

You wake up one morning and realize that it's probably too late to do it; you'll never do it again .................. , ..................

The sounds slip out of my hands .................. , ..................

Music does nothing but offer a reflection of pure, senseless rationality .................. , ..................

A certain image of music has collapsed for me; no longer belongs to me; and it's not my task to attempt to restore or perpetuate it .................. , ..................

The horror of music is that there are no longer any intervals .................. , ..................

Well below that threshold of perception where sounds begin the exhale an unbearable stench .................. , ..................

Dreaming a day-dream while asleep and dreaming that I dream a dreamt dream .................. , ..................

But why have all these people gathered here? .................. , ..................

By now the world is convered by a great, vibrant sheath .................. , ..................

In the liquid oblivion of a kiss .................. , ..................

A music free of all cognitive associations that derive from habit .................. , ..................

Sounds, in my music, are the very last thing: non-essential and empty .................. , ..................

My ears betray no emotion in the presence of sounds; they seem content simply to be present .................. , ..................

Not managing to accept the others for what they are .................. , ..................

A concert. An audience. The audience is listening to nothing at all .................. , ..................

Time is our very own breathing .................. , ..................

Everything else is to be discarded. I'm waiting for the first ray of sunlight .................. , ..................

All it contained is the effort to establish no domination over even the tiniest element .................. , ..................

The sun is hot, I'm waiting for the afternoon .................. , ..................

Music is like a battlefield where clearly there's no way of hiding the movement towards the void .................. , ..................

As an appetizer, Craig Dworkin offers these questions:

But what would a non-expressive poetry look like? A poetry of intellect rather than emotion? One in which the substitutions at the heart of metaphor and image were replaced by the direct presentation of language itself, with "spontaneous overflow" supplanted by meticulous procedure and exhaustively logical process? In which the self-regard of the poet's ego were turned back onto the self-reflexive language of the poem itself? So that the test of poetry were no longer whether it could have been done better (the question of the workshop), but whether it could conceivably have been done otherwise.

Patterns as Literature

OuLiPo = L'Ouvroir de littérature potentielle [Workshop for potential literature]

Oulipo members explore Dworkin's "otherwise" & give it theoretical shape. Jean Lescure documents:

François Le Lionnais wrote: Every literary work begins with an inspiration. . .which must accomodate itself as well as possible to a series of constraints and procedures, etc. What the Oulipo intended to demonstrate was that these constraints are felicitous, generous, and are in fact literature itself. What it proposed was to discover new ones, under the name of structures [173].

Lescure testifies that Oulipo wished to deconstruct the myth of artistic genius & show the literature operates in another manner:

[Raymond Queneau states] The really inspired person is never inspired, but always inspired. . .this sentence implied the revolutionary conception of the objectivity of literature, and from that time forward opened the latter to all possible modes of manipulation. In short, like mathematics, literature could be explored [173].

Organism + Machine

Norbert Wiener argues in his writings on cybernetics that the world runs on the transmission of information. And these signals & messages can travel seamlessly between organisms & human-constructed technology:

When I give an order to a machine, the situation is not essentially different from that which arises when I give an order to a person. In other words, as far as my consciousness goes I am aware of the order that has gone out and of the signal of compliance that has come back. To me, personally, the fact that the signal in its intermediate stages has gone through a machine rather than a person is irrelevant and does not in any case greatly change my relation to the signal.

Scientists such as Wiener gave early digital poetry pioneers--including Theo Lutz & Nanni Balestrini--the foundation needed to creatively interact with computers. Wiener's ideas would also inform John McCarthy's conception of artificial intelligence, or the notions that machines can learn & adapt (we now take this for granted, but it was scoffed at when McCarthy proposed it in the lates 1950s).

Implications for Creativity

IF
poetry = "act of intuitively or conceptually building meaningful (emotional, conceptual, spiritual, perceptual) patterns with words" [Jhave 126]

AND
writers = "sets & repertoires of technqiues & perceptions" [Jhave 128]

THEN
procedural writing = execution of experiments to move beyond individuals' predictable patterns


Procedural writing asks writers to relinquish (outsource?) control not to chaos, but to a programmed process to discover creative possibilities.


Sources

Dworkin, Craig. Introduction to UbuWeb Anthology of Conceptual Writing

Jhave Johnston, David. Aesthetic Animism: Digital Poetry's Ontological Implications, MIT [2016]

Lescure, Jean. "Brief History of the Oulipo," New Media Reader, edited Nick Montfort & Noah Wardrip-Fruin, MIT [1003].

Wiener, Norbert. The Human Use of Human Beings, Doubleday [1964].

The curtains of daffodil-yellow, a little night music thru us. The Poverty of the Spirituals the heart desired, drawing its torture like French perfume.

So deep that he is blue. The extent of the shadows, parts of the sentence. Phantasies at the Back of the North Wind. Light beyond the Secret Books.

Paul Klee scratched for seven years on my head, love. I begin in blue, knowing the waste, leaving blood already running there.

In the dark of the peppertree, you will often tell the story, the slaughter of man's hope, forbidden hallucinogen. Whitman devotees not even sold on the war. America, you boil over.

The Sun conscripted, killing, killing to be done with it. In Las Vegas, in Wall Street, the streets swarm. Let us stay with what we know. Lush places, our hands.

Beloved destroyers cannot tell us the seasons.

I/O/I/O/I/O /I/O/I/O/I/ O/I/O/I/O/ I/O/I/O/I /O/I/O/I /O/I/O/ I/O/I/ O/I/O /I/O /I/ O/ I

rusty congaree

outsized ambitions

Since Romanticism, poets often share a love of idiosyncratic, ambitious & hermetic systems. Think: Whitman's Leaves of Grass or Pound's Cantos. Most iconic for me is Charles Olson's Maximus Poems & its obsession with size: Gloucester as portal not only into American colonial history but also the prehistoric supercontinent of Gondwana. The physical book's got heft too; the University of California edition runs 652 9” x 12” pages.

I am exhausted by this obsession with large scope projects, this need for a poem contain the entire world. My brain can only process so much before it vomits words everywhere.

downsized poetics

There are poets who avoid the epic.

Larry Eigner is one. An acquaintance of Olson, Eigner swerved away from myth-making or even a locatable “I.” Instead, Eigner offers curated language:

Jan 20 78 #1057

the fleering snow

off the eaves

of the garage

I'm not quite sure what “fleering” is, but snow certainly does it. Eigner's quiet inventions turn away from the P.T. Barnum antics of so much experimental poetry.

Another example: Mexican poet Efraín Huerta invented the poemínimo, a compressed anti-poetry mixing riddles, bad jokes, street slang, & esoteric theory. Jerome Rothenberg has translated a number of these at Jacket2. The following is a personal favorite:

Francisco I

Paráfrasis

Todo Se ha Jodido Menos El amor

Saint Francis I

A Paraphrase

Everything's Fucked Up Except Love

I've also tried translating poemínimos, but they're tricky. Each word is multivalent & carries tremendous weight. This is the most successful attempt:

Arenguita

Paranoicos De todos Los matices ¡Uníos!

Arenguita

Paranoid freaks Of all stripes Unite!

Huerta describes his words in the following way: “The poemínimo is like the turning of a corner or the next stop on the subway line. A poemínimo is a crazy butterfly, captured sometimes, sometimes crammed into a straitjacket.” Instead of whole worlds, Huerta offers small bits of uncanny bizarre mystery.

composition machines

When talking of poetic systems, it's necessary to pay homage to those who compose through procedures & programs. These writers, the descendants of the 'pataphysicians & OuLiPo, also seriously question any Romantic/Modernist notions that language can simply & naturally express the human condition. These writers draw attention to words' unstable, provisional nature.

Ron Silliman defines poems in “Surprised by Sign” in a striking manner: “Any poem's a language: a vocabulary plus a set of rules.” In 2019's algorithm-dominant zeitgeist, is there more relevant description for poetry? Let's look to poets working in the fluxing nexus between poetry & computer programming. Allison Parrish is a skilled practitioner of this sort of creativity. On the federated social media network, Mastodon, she's programmed a poetry bot, Icebox Breakfast Bot, which cannibalizes William Carlos Williams' great-yet-overtaught-in-every-fucking-English-class “This is Just to Say.” Here's a great example:

Those Were Precisely to Perceive

They were glycerolizing a few of the plums who were with regard to your icebox

and whom it will probably repose during breakfast

Endanger them I am delicious decidedly sweet but fitly cold

On the bot's GitHub, Parrish frames her bot as a response to Mark Sample's Just to Say Bot. While Sample's bot uses Williams' poem to highlight capitalist exploitation, Parrish says her bot “is about all the whimsical scenarios you can think up about plums, iceboxes and breakfasting.” Whimsical estrangement indeed abounds in Icebox Breakfast Bot's posts. The delights of breaking apart conventional syntax & reference. It reminds me of Charles Bernstein's slapstick theoretical poetricks.

conclusions

Whether it's thru bots, “Language” poets, or OuLiPo procedures, small-scale systems can help poets escape the void of personal expression, the me, me, me of it all. Let's transform writing into a series of controlled experiments. We need more room for small-scale poetic systems that make the everyday strange again. Unassuming poems that spark surprise & goad us to approach words anew. Something like this piece of poetic play from Ryan Randall, another Mastodon user:

Wishing I could make an Espers-meets-Forest Swords kinda autumnal ep

d(t

he

ba ss

dr op

s) ub

step

Bruce Andrews & Charles Bernstein began the 6th issue of L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E (December 1978) asking various writers to respond to Gertrude Stein's Tender Buttons. Larry Eigner submitted the following short compelling piece that not only interprets Stein's writing, but channels its spirit. Eigner remains an underappreciated poet. Future posts will deal with his poetics in more detail. For now, savor this:

A CARAFE. . . GLAZED GLITTER ROASTBEEF (through a glass darkly)

Larry Eigner

Ok murky in after all end, unpredictable day, with rain shine any degree night, the sun kin warm and hot. Enough stone or other jugs lineup of whatever is In Through Out That's light as much as known Differences evanesce Like, where and/or what on the equator might be french or spanish Longitude and latitude, yep yep sure Americana

But could someone mobile with us sleep downstairs, in case of some needs? The amount of variety, seen small, or a knockabout maybe in fact. Going deep and strong suddenly three times, though not any more in a while. Mystery on occasion frightens, hurts what you don't know. Sleep came and nothing in square feet changed and later morning is too again there.

And however long the new days all. Every new second minute at least. But the more there is the less you have in common, knowledge of pieces, experience taken in. Bit by bit or in what or how many dimensions. Is there any further inch to a holograph of a spread? Lightning's fast in bed or anyplace. Monuments mixed in haystacks lost.

Nothing is too dull.