epithet

71 Virgins were the most Satanic Promises Rushdie

Did they manage to kill him by the way? Was it a gut shot? Was someone around him gravely compromised. A bitter pill? But my man Phil Haney, who absolutely did not kill himself after making quality organized content, encountering a woman of good background, being appointed to a leadership position in an organization in need of leadership, with a pay raise, suddenly decides to shoot himself in the chest just off a highway.

Sure IntelReform. What was your suffix again? Over in China, the material of propaganda is ranked as the job of military generals.

Cutttlefish Gangsters. Barely a sign. That the turnover could be sanitary. It would be observably covered. That is not the means of turnover of that place. If it wasn't gangsters, the guy texting on his phone about me raising the possibility was an agent as a part of a very expensive, unprofitable organization.

The Mosquitoes. Come awake when they hear the heaving hives of swat. When awakened from the water surface, carbon dioxide guidance to protein. Other than size what is different between a parasite and a predator? When we are so overmatched, there is no relevant distinction.

Here's an epithetic Caught at one more remove

We came into the game to say who's to blame chances in your town waiting for the showdown To Mr. Philip Josef HASSLER

“But when Lucilius brandishes his pen, And flashes in the face of guilty men, A cold sweat stands in drops on ev'ry part, And rage succeeds to tears, revenge to smart.” -Dryden

I hope this you letter finds you well. I would like it better if never reaches you because you're free. From what I hear, in any case, you've interior freedom. I've never met you and know you only from whatever wasn't scrubbed online. I hear your satire got you into trouble. The tracks I heard were cathartic in a crazy age. Satire is a job which becomes more dangerous the more memorable it is.

Every case I've heard of where someone is demonstrably injured (as opposed to offended), it's the satirist. In antiquity Aesop and Boethius were said to have been executed. One Ali Ferzat in Syria had his hands broken so he didn't draw again. In France, Voltaire was imprisoned. A cartoonist in Malaysia faced 43 years in prison. And, apparently, a man was sentenced to 10 years in Austria.

I don't know Austrian law, haven't read the judgement but I am curious as to their reasoning:

It was difficult for me fathom, however offensive you were, whatever neurotic was on the bench, you could have merited such brutal punishment. Was it perhaps because an imaginary person was so insane that satire caused she/him to commit a horrific crime? If so, why didn't they blame his/her imaginary psychotherapist. I don't understand why hate is treated as an egregious emotion. In the commission of a crime, is hate more particularly odious than Anger? Love? Pride? Desire? Jealousy? Wouldn't amusement be by far the more sinister? Desire for wealth or power? Wait, go back, why is there no category for amusement crimes?

This is nonsense. Singling out hatred is the result of a sustained and longstanding application of the Hegelian dialectic. A term and its definition are shifted by small increments, very gradually. They come to designate something quite different while the literal definition remains the same.

In the case of “hate”, it has become a crime in itself. Malfeasance involving hate is singled out as especially evil. Disagreements over legitimacy are determined by alleged hate. A person is immoral and more dangerous if they hate. It has even become evidence of guilt. So if someone is malignant, sardonic, unforgiveable.

The power of the method is astonishing. The power to make gravely unacceptable, meriting ostracization punishment. The term Aufheben der Kultur in the tradition of the Frankfurt school is just as much “prepare the culture” as “cancel culture”, and both are implemented de facto.

If someone is assaulted, I draw your eye to the animal who wipes out more human beings, Far from medical advances making them more benign, the Mosquito will literally remain the most deadly delivery vector. So bring the music.

If anyone claimed they committed a crime because of you, no specific allegations are public, I've yet to even see direct accusations. So 10 years. A friend of mine a Portugese veteran tells me when he was younger, if you were at a bus stop a maladroit comment could ensure from that day forth nobody would ever see you again.

American rap music is bloated with “I'm going to do this, I'm going to do that, murder, intimidation, drug dealing.” It's not appropriate for kids, but it's not the reason kids get involved in crime. You did. Unforgiveable. You moved on a propaganda monopoly – a powerful tool knocked from the hands of some powerful people. Lucrative as ‘tis, can be as bad a prize as you could be caught holding.

“3. Manslaughter No mandatory minimum (unless with a firearm – then minimum is 4 years). Mean sentence: Typically 4 to 10 years, depending on aggravating/mitigating factors.”

That's a machine learning description of Canada's manslaughters routinely less draconian than Austria's hate speech laws. A substantial portion of people reside in less than 10 years for taking a human life in some stupid blunder. In Canada, the maximum sentence for hate speech is about five years, though it's usually deployed as an exacerbating factor in sentencing.

I've never heard a case where some rant earned the maximum here. Over they I guess they convicted you of the maximum, which I find unsettling and it's fair to say you have courage: you knew you were wandering into deep waters.

I was shocked when I heard about your sentence. Related accusations have been proposed as crimes in Canada, for any and all violations of federal criminal law, illegal emotion can merit 25 year sentences. This revolutionary proposal was ever so gently pushed aside rather than having the soil from which it grew sowed with salt. The system offered the Hegelian sleight of hand. Again shifts again without any change literal definition. It works best on labile minds. That's why they ply an audience young as possible. A parent can be imprisoned for 5 years, there are psychological quacks aplenty.

I remembered to write you when I began reading Juvenal's satires recently. the ostensive dishonesty,. a time tested reference point to key positions. Essentially all the universities in Canada are like that, and the credentialism of the justice system is on its way. Justice systems are set over time, criminal law is designed to be comparatively robust. It's supposed to be inflexible, not easily unfucked.

I've been seeing wild inconsistencies in sentencing here in Canada. Juvenal hating watching Rome's spiritual decay. As several of the most successful military thinkers have indicated: Breaking the spirit of your enemy is crucial. spirit is broken first. Disturbingly recognizable 2,000 years later.

We are exposed to artificial methods of reorganizing our minds. From an early age, susceptible to dialectical manipulation. Which need only synthesize new connections without changing the literal definition. The addition of a variety of associations so the meaning of the word seems the same.

A suitably prepared neural network can make remarkably swift and indirect associations. However, when the reference point “gold” has become autonomous

The introduction of data pertaining to an incomplete mental, exacerbates out blind spots. Cognitive load is why people find disagreement stressful. The introduction of facts creates an involuntary cognitive load. But we can also be shielded can be trained to instinctively turn on anyone who strays too close to the truth. Thought crime today? Why? Because you're filling in blanks about how we got here and plainly stating where we are.

illegal tender. Clearly hate is illegal. Bemusement? Confusion? Have we gone far enough to prohibit delighted surprise? What sort of discernment? Not discrimination. Are we allowed to see the differences and diversities in our environment?

Juvenal's satires are a good example, satire pillories ethnic stereotypes, mock sexual depravity. Some characters prefigure today's fashionable “intersectional identities”. people whose identity is built on moral deformity. People leaving them incapable of repentance, the only vestige of shame is hypocrisy. Juvenal shocks the reader by portraying monsters as monsters. He hated to see an empire built on generations of blood in the process of decay. There was no retrieving past events, but he could force his contemporaries to behold their situation.

The highest aspiration of rap is dopamine dealing, violence and gangsterism. Drug culture is killing by the hundreds of thousands in America, actual events being, if nothing else, the sound track of this rap culture. Not everybody's cut out to be a gangster.

Your sentence in Vienna was not because you were crude. It was the result of verisimilitude. “Extremist” in the opinion of a handful of spooks. It's illustrative of your condition. It's a pattern that seems to repeat itself across the west: Where a state has begun to fail its key functions, it is particularly inept at identifying the source of decay.

You took the preselected group of songs which were contagious, popular and familiar and introduced lyrics, ideas in themes which are heavily suppressed. Glorious. When I send this, I will have to make a back-up. It can be hard to find. The internet archive used to have a copy of most of your work but who knows who runs the site and, inevitably, removed them. I am relatively certain your music is instructive in discovering social engineering.

Prison is an expensive accommodation. If the government is prepared to spend hundreds of thousands of Euros to keep you locked up, you can be sure that when you come out they will invest time and money to limit your distribution and surveil your activity.

You portraits are shocking insane, but because they depict monstrosities.

Should people who listen be impugned as viciously as from Mark 5:4 ... “he had many times been left secured with fetters and chains, he had snapped the chains and broken the fetters to pieces, and no one could master him.”... Unfortunately this legal condition does not rely on any other criminality. Allowing insane people to lock you up for ten years is criminal. You know as well as they do that is a decision to run it out this way,

They were perfectly happy to make an example of you. Everyone knows it takes litter to trigger psychotics. And you dropped a cement truck where a feather would do. That's progress!

Don't hate the Dinka People. I think we're allowed to hate tall people as long as I don't mention their average height. That would by implication, although height in itself is not a prohibited grounds of discrimination, thus constitute illegal discrimination based on ethnic and national origin.\ [CSIS[Canadian Security Intelligence Service], Word from American Secret Service has it CSIS is a leaky ship. x]

American rap music is “I'm going to do this, I'm going to do that, murder, intimidation, drug dealing.” Punished not so much for the zeitgeist, but the specifics of their crime.

*** -

The Author of 71 Virgins

The rape should be vicious as it is emblematic of whites being raped and murdered by the thousands.

Obviously we would never hear of most of them had not some shit skin somali harassed a weary a mother. I once described him as a grown man, but he is a subhuman as are most somalis. They are subhuman. Precious as rats. Loyal as cats. Forgetful as birds. Soaring like worms.

#0428 Let's look into it. Did we have 20,000 good men dropped into a pit?

It's never a non-neglible, such events happen by the thousands, you know. But it would neither be unique as a fictional event, nor unique as yet another atrocity against human kind.

Thems Fesliyan Studios

ep 4transcoded Title: Upon Reflection Album FesliyanStudio

The new police chief is a peach though. The most conspicuous trait is that doesn't mention police misconduct. He's young, smug, likes cameras and reporters fawn over him. Are they cynical or are they duped?

It's a janus-faced system. The police have developed a habit of lying in court. If he is effective, the public will accept capricious enforcement. The reporters will stay on message, the ranks and file will recognize that their authority is neither justice nor law.

Tranquile civil life doesn't last forever. I don't think the public ever recognizes the infrastructure of depotism. When it's built, they can wait decades, even generations until they are claimed by their rightful master.

The War on Violence: The Cataclysm of the Post-National Police State [this is a work in progress. the beginning is dysjointed because it was exerpted from another []\ More of a stream of consciousness, although the section on why the Police state has potential for a separate essay] Regimes like the 20th century totalitarians put great resources into assessing affinity, then selecting against ability, beliefs and lineage with brutal efficiency.

Another example is Rwanda. The massacre of a large portion of the population was carried out with crude implements. What is less known is that this large scale extermination was cleverly planned: lists of Tutsis of various strengths – political influence, intellect or courage – were compiled and they were hunted down. Thus stripped of the skeletal 'connective tissue', the likely already docile Tutsis were ripe for slaughter.

Targeted assassinations have been used for millions of years. Among the most obvious is challenging the alpha male. (Perhaps the very origin of murder is the capacity to recognize that it has happened out of sight. Look up cain and abel)

Whether they are obliquely sabotaged, expenses imposed, libeled, fired or eliminated, I assume scale and scope of dysgenic sabotage has been expanding. It is broad enough that outright violence need only be an adjunct to the Unrestricted Warfare. The Suspicions of white genocide, recently relegated to cultural fringes, has broken to the surface. Hasty and brazen efforts are being exhibited. It is now sloppy enough to 'redpill' those who are doctrinally civic nationalism. This is acceptable to its proponents since whites already verge on irreversible demographic decline. Generally, they are quicker to recognize what religion has already instilled in them such as aversion to sexual degeneracy or blasphemy. The cultural doctrines such as free expression are also safe to identify as being under siege. [How far it may be done expressly, I don't know. But it is understood, even by those who circumstances require they remains silent on it.]

It is sloppy. The six percent are fucking white women about half the time. [Naturally they are not half the murderers, reported or depicted.] They can be gangsters where necessary, but otherwise sexy, protagonists or benign. I note that the unhyphenated blacks, the African Africans, do not feature nearly so prominently, despite their massive demographic future. Africa's population growth is on a scale which would terrify the American Negro. No need to spook the livestock. After all, the American “Black” is likely as not to have more European ancestry than Black. The number of slaves was never very large.

They are of the Negro, by the Negro, for the Negro because it is not their lineage, but the fact that it is mixed that is core to the representation of their identity.

The contrast between this fetish and the Jew, along with their role in this ruse, has lead some to attribute it exclusively to the agency of organized Jewry. I defer to Kevin MacDonald, but I would call this a hazardous simplification. People have a pathological preoccupation with blame. Although Jews have been instrumental in the delusions that give us “Critical Race Theory” and “civic nationalism”

Outright murder is generally not generally even necessary under doctrines such as the Chinese method of “Unrestricted Warfare” https://www.oodaloop.com/documents/unrestricted.pdf

Similarly, as progressive intellectuals hasten to point out, the number of people killed in white countries by the religious moslem is really very small. Even the broadcasters cannot quite evade its sensational character, but they have adapted to it in a way that was not possible as recently as 2001. In each instance of violence involving Moslems in western countries – either as perpetrators or innocents [the innocence of muslims] – solidarity with the broader muslim community becomes a central narrative. The opponents is violent extremism, so they claim.

The efficacy of the Countering Violent Extremism narrative is beyond dispute. 1. Mockery of Islam as a religion is manifestly related to its proven ability to punish those who publicly deride its precepts, symbol or speak to its janus-faced nature. 2. Inter-faith organizations are prepared for high profile media events. The engagement of multiple demographics is impossible to resist for elected officials. The Jews have an opportunity to denounce Islamic aggression, the neo-Christians can conflate their doctrines of peace with the Muslims who say “Peace, Peace” where their theology of “Peace” is identical to that of militant and fundamentalist's understanding.
3. The educational background and brief of law enforcement is explicitly oriented towards enforcement of law, and not meet to grapple with alternative systems of law. Elected officials largely dictate the laws which are to be enforced. Although Cops are supposedly above political considerations and habitually circumvent statutes, their explicit task is to obey statutes constructed by politicians. 4. The more sophisticated intelligence and counter-intelligence agencies are aware of the religious component, but legally and dialectically prohibited from organizing their efforts as a religious battle. This is why individuals such as Phil Haney and Stephen Coughlin, despite their expertise, were vigorously expelled from the intelligence and security community. In the case of Phil Haney, murdered once slated to re-enter in a leadership role. 5. Possibly the most important role of the violent extremism narrative is its ability to be directed against any domestic insurgency, of any kind. In particular, against white 'radicalism'. This concept is far more expansive and ambiguous than Islam. Conservatives manage to sell themselves a free lunch: A coherent principled stance against Islam, without the political complications of opposing Islam. Since they are largely white, they gain the illusory advantage of sharing a common enemy with the left.

[*I must later examine a very interesting trait of this fifth point: The CVE narrative is only applied to “radical islam” in the sense that it is radical, but in “violent white supremacy” or “violent white nationalism”, the ideology itself is explained to be the target. This is partly because Islam has a legally enshrined status as a religion, but white cohesion is an intellectual's bugaboo. And partly because Muslims are politically situated to sabotage, and ideologically prepared to conduct violent actions against those who stand athwart their theology of dominance.]

The Countering Violent Extremism policy is a disaster. Nobody will be spared the consequences of this political accommodation. It is is a gift to the globalists with their Hegelian methodology. But it is more tragic than conspiratorial. The dispossession of Canadians as Canadians is already at hand. The state retains its monopoly of violence on the premise that its role is to maintain order among the people within its borders.

The corporate and economic interests provide for the interests of human beings alike. Immigration provide for a fungible and mobile body of labor. The social welfare system provides physical safety. The state promises shared identity by common system of law. By necessity, social welfare is not equally accessible (communism), and relies on an economic system which transfers organizational control of resources towards the state. The laws which are enforced constitute the only thing all citizens have in common. Without realizing it, we have build what is fundamentally a police state.

A police state? Impossible! In Canada, a law abiding person will have few, if any, interactions with police. A large majority are very happy for that protection. Safety is what matters. The safety of welfare services, the safety of police protection, the safety of available jobs. Self-defense is largely the provenance of political constituencies and they are obligated to do so non-violently.

A police state is jack-booted thugs hauling people off for political dissent. We imagine oppressed classes treated capriciously. We imagine a state where non-violent dissent is delegitimized and punished. But Canada is equitable. We are equal under the law.

A police state has been established. Safety is an illusion, although masked at the moment. Equality is a farce. And political constituencies do not share common interests, culture, racial proclivities or convictions. The narrative that some are oppressed has begun to seep into both culture and law, and differential treatment is growing – and will continue to grow. Moreover, the principles of international interests are eating away at the legal unity of the country. We have created a circumstance where the law is becoming internationalized, as with energy policy. Political constituencies are internationalized; the inevitable result of the multi-cult, which comes at the expense of a unified white nation. Non-violent dissent on the part of whites is becoming criminalized, while non-white nepotism is tolerated.

The premises that distinguish our imagined police state from the regime continue to fray. There is no way this can be sustained through severe crises. The belief that an inherently unstable system will remain unified is buttressed only from the confidence in the law. As the intellectual class becomes more irrational, laws become more numerous, specialized and intrusive, socialism becomes more uneconomical, more unequal, the inherent disunity of races, ideologies, religions and corporations will reassert their diverging interests, and the binding force will be the police.

*A little known atrocity: I read the british field officers in WWI averaged(!) an IQ equivalent of 120, but had the highest casualty rate given the tactics of the time.

The Park is empty, it is dark. No trails in the snow. It's closed. Because Covid. 8 AM to 4 PM. 2 M distance mandatory. Not optional. Nor is the possibility of walking in the dark, alone.

On those rare occasions when I see through this miasma of bullshit, although generally considered insane, it's nice to know for certain that I am not the crazy one. And I will return with snips, a good knife, garden clippers, and take the placard of insanity as a memento.