justmyblogstuff

Lacking motivation? Here are TV/movie characters who inspire us to well, turn off the TV and movies, and hit the books.

Hermione Granger Need I say more? Hermione is the poster girl for NERD. She makes studying seem like a fun game. Remember, every time you get an answer right, it's 10 points for Gryffindor!

Rory Gilmore Though she's my least favorite TV character, I have to say, she really is quite the student. You can't help but want to root for her when she first gets a D at Chilton, but then rises to the top with flying colors and lots of As. If only studying were that fun and easy in real life.

Elle Woods Like Rory Gilmore, she starts out as the underdog. At least her pink study gear looks cute.

Jenny Mellor The An Education protagonist starts out like most of us. She'd rather be listening to jazz, traveling to Paris and living the good life than study. That's when she almost has sex with a 38-year-old man (she's 16) that she realizes she's “too clever” to live life as a fraud (her said 38-year-old boyfriend (more like manfriend) steals paintings for a living). She then decides to study her ass off and gets rewarded with the idyllic lifestyle at Oxford.

Anna Kendrick (do we really care about the character's name?) In Up in the Air, Anna plays the top graduating student from an Ivy League school. While everyone's losing jobs in the 2008 recession, Kendrick is up and going, set to have “a corner office by 23.” Yet her perfectionist attitude might be a little...neurotic.

So that's it! Study away my friends. Hopefully these characters provide us with much motivation to power through the final stretch (or probably not). And oh, I guess I should stop writing this blog and start studying for finals. D:

That is all.

The blogger

#movies

People (and I’m guilty of this too) like to say how movies were better in the good ole’ days. Well, not all movies in the present day are bad. We have a few good ones and someday, people will look back on this generation and say they don’t make movies like this anymore!

So in honor of that tradition, here are some of my fave movies from 2010 onwards for when I become a granny and say, “They don’t make movies like this anymore!”

Pride and Prejudice Yes I know this is from 2005 but my point still stands that this is a very modern movie that people will appreciate for being good.

Super 8

Les Miserables

Great Gatsby What is old is old, but in this movie, what is old is new. This fresh, new take really brings out the essence and energy of the 20s. I don't know about you but anyone who can make 20s technology seem newer than the iPhone is a master filmmaker in my book. It would be interesting to experiment with perspectives that we normally don't see, like making the present day seem old too. The storytelling and visuals are unique, whereas other Hollywood movies nowadays just do the exact same thing in all genres. This director clearly had vision.

The Hunger GamesJennifer Lawrence is awesome.

Frozen

Moana

Star Wars: The Force AwakensJJ Abrams always knows how to make a decent movie.

La La LandThis movie is literally a response to they-don’t-movies-like-this-anymore.

The Amazing Spider-Man

What current movies will you be nostalgic for? Comment below!

That is all,

The Blogger

#movies

Goodness is subjective. Art is subjective.

Someone once said that by studying film, your taste will get “better.” That you can still like a bad movie, but it’s still bad. I find that thinking pretentious.

Even if a movie is universally considered bad, if you like it, that means something in that movie speaks to you, that made you enjoy it. It could be the music, the action, or the characters. Ergo, the movie’s done its job and is therefore a good movie. It might not speak to the majority, but it still speaks to you. You can learn to appreciate the advanced technique of critically acclaimed movies, but obligated to like them you are not. Like Two For the Road. I’m aware of the unique editing skills but it’s still a boring movie and there’s a reason that it’s boring. In that sense, it has failed. And it'd be kinda sad if you stopped loving the movies you once loved just cause your taste got “better.” Of course tastes naturally change but there is a reason, something that the filmmakers did, that made those movies appeal to you in the first place.

My teacher once said that it annoys her when people don’t have a reason why they dislike a movie. When she asks them why, they go “I dunno, I just don't.” Everything must be explained intelligently. I disagree. You don’t have to explain why you don’t like something and you’re completely entitled to your opinion. People might not be able to articulate exactly why they like their favorite movies, but their instincts are telling them something. Knowing these things helps if you want to make movies or go into that field, but for the average Joe, you like what you like. Simple enough. No need to justify your preferences to please others. After all, movies weren’t designed to make people super intellectual even if they can include intellectual things. If people only liked or disliked movies for purely logical reasons, then movies wouldn’t be art anymore. It would be a hard science, which defeats the whole purpose of movies in the first place. After all, movies are better judged by its overall effect rather than the sum of its parts.

And that’s why I wonder if I’m starting to become too evaluative about movies. That I should just relax and enjoy the movie-watching process more like I did before, when I fell in love with movies in the first place and just sit back and be absorbed and not worry about judging.

I’m not sure if I’m starting to be pretentious about my supposed lack of pretentiousness. But comment below what you think. It would be quite hypocritical of me if that were so. But I love irony. So a good dash of it in my life would be amusing I suppose.

That is all.

The Blogger

#movies

I don’t really like the word “film.” It sounds too pretentious. Idk whenever I hear the word “film”, I just think of some boring French noir indie movie about some poor gay dude stranded in the desert somewhere and his friend/mom/little kid neighbor next door gets cancer or something. And then all those awful colored filters and shaky cam that make the whole thing look like your friend’s Instagram video. Saying “film” makes movies sound more boring.

I prefer “movie.” It sounds more like a fun Hollywood blockbuster that’s really epic. They’re kind of the reason I liked movies in the first place. I think people say the word “film” a lot so that other people would respect them for studying it. It would be really weird to say my major is movies. It just doesn’t sound academia or intellectual enough so I think people say “film” so that they’d be taken more seriously.

I also like the word “cinema.” It sounds fancy and has a nice, full ring to it. It sounds like a rich person drinking fine wine going to the opera kind of fancy. Fun fact, they did make movie theaters like operas back in the day to appeal to rich people.

I just can’t believe British people say “film” instead of “movie.” They must sound so pretentious all the time.

That is all.

The Blogger

#movies

“A children’s story that can only be enjoyed by children is not a good children’s story in the slightest.”

— C.S. Lewis

It irritates me to no end when people think Disney is just for kids. Walt himself intended for his movies to be for both adults and kids alike. It’s why he invested so much quality and effort into his movies because he knew he had to please the adults, not just produce cheap entertainment to temporarily satisfy the kids. He wanted his movies to be timeless. Keep in mind that his movies are appropriate enough for kids to watch (family movies). It’s just that they’re not meant exclusively for kids.

A lot of people think that in order for a “kids” movie to be adult enough, it has to have a deep, adult message. Well I can’t tell you how many live-action, “adult” movies I’ve seen that have no deep message whatsoever but are deemed mature just because they have lots of guns and/or sex and are not animated. It also depends what you mean by a deep message. Many think that Zootopia has a deep message but that doesn’t make it an “adult” movie. If anything, I find Zootopia to be preachy, which only makes Zootopia more like a kids movie talking down to its audience. The message in Zootopia isn't deep at all. It focuses on a very specific, modern, social issue, which wouldn’t be as relevant in the past or future. The whole script reads like a bad buzzfeed article. Watching the movie without sound is actually better because the actions say it all. The cheesy dialogue (and the really bad music) on top is just overkill. If anything, the message in Zootopia is faux deep in a cheap way.

To me, a deep message would be timeless. Walt Disney said, “I want my entertainment to educate, not my education to entertain.” Movies like Zootopia and Mean Girls are exactly education that tries to entertain, which is why I find them overrated. Meanwhile, Walt Disney’s movies add education, the lessons of life, to ENHANCE the artistic quality of his entertainment, not the other way around. In Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, it’s good in light of darkness. Sleeping Beauty, true love conquers all. In Peter Pan, it’s balancing growing up with your inner child. These messages are simple, but deep. They can be applied to any time period. Instead of being shoved in your face, they are shown subtly through the action and the overall story, which is enough. The overall theme of Walt’s company and all of his movies combined is imagination and believing that dreams come true. After all, he focused on the fantasy genre.

Deepness doesn’t mean that a story has to be morose. Just because a movie is overall optimistic doesn’t make it fluffy or lack depth. There are many sad, sad movies that are shallow and there are many happy movies that are deep. I hate how people dismiss Disney movies just because they’re too happy. These people should watch Snow White, Bambi, Pinnochio and Fantasia before brushing off Disney as some sort of happy-go-lucky company. Some of Walt’s earliest works were actually pretty dark. Sometimes deep messages can be better executed in fantasy than reality. Both Beauty and the Beast (fantasy) and The Hunchback of Notre Dame (which is more realistic) focus on inner beauty, but Beauty and the Beast delivers the message better, in a way that’s more fantasy-like, more powerful, more entertaining and less depressing. Hunchback is overrated and doesn’t really fit in with the Disney company as a whole.

I can’t tell you how often I hear, “No I don’t wanna see that cause it’s animated!” Back then, animation wasn’t seen as something that was only for kids. Snow White was seen as an adult film. In fact, many kids peed their seats in theaters because it was too scary for them. Somehow, people associate fantasy and animation with being juvenile when really, fairytales and animation are seriously underrated and you can learn so much from them. I blame it on the marketing. Even Disney itself is partially guilty. I don’t mind the amusement parks or merchandise. I actually love them because they extend and enhance the experience of the movies through a 3-D world that would have been limited on screen. But making shitty sequels ruins the earlier, classic works at the expense of the cash cow. Now people think animation is just kids’ cartoons. Walt made his animated movies high quality, which is why they earned respect from adults. But ever since animation started to be viewed as merely child’s play, animation companies have decreased their quality and the cycle continues. Thankfully though, animation seems to be slowly gaining respect again (or maybe that’s just me) but not so much.

So what if the movies are G-rated? I remember everyone wanting to grow up so they could watch R-rated movies. Well, I’d happily go back and watch a good G-rated movie than a trashy R-rated one. The best movies are G-rated because they actually have to tell a story, not produce porn and violence. I grew up only to find that R-rated movies actually suck and that I prefer G-rated movies anyway. We waited for nothing.

Walt never did underestimate the power of a simple story, beautiful animation and elegant music. He hired the best animators (the nine old men) plus Mary Blair to make every movie of his literally look like a moving painting. He searched for the best voice actors and wasn’t satisfied with any one of them until he found the one. He knew that excellence was in the details, and excellence did come. Even his writing is well done. That’s why I continue to love Disney (even as an adult) and have so much respect for him as a movie-maker. In fact, I think many filmmakers would do well to study his craft. Honestly, schools should start teaching Disney classes, and it would be no different than studying Shakespeare. Don't laugh. If you want to dismiss Disney as babyish entertainment, you’re missing out big time on one of the greatest cultural contributors of our time, someone who I’d put next to Shakespeare, Dickens, etc. Not all art appreciation has to be in the past. It’s right in front of you. If people back then had known how important they’d become, they’d probably have read more Hemingway or attended more Shakespeare plays, so what better way to celebrate the culture and art in our MODERN era than Disney? And yes, Disney was unpretentious, but that only makes it all the better. The fact that he could make such great art that also appealed to the masses is an accomplishment worthy of itself and how do we say — magic. Simplicity does not equal lack of sophistication and complexity does not equal intellect.

All this ridicule is even causing Disney to harm itself, starting with the snide remarks in its newer movies, in vain attempt to seem hip or cool to modern audiences. “You can’t marry a man you just met” in Frozen, making fun of believing in dreams (the very PREMISE of Disney) in The Princess and The Frog and Zootopia, and the princess bashing in Moana. Disney dumping on itself only hurts the image of the company as a whole, making its cherished traditions seem foolish and disrespects its earlier works, which are indeed great and undervalued.

I know this sounds like I’m nostalgic for the “old” Disney and critical of the “new” Disney. After all, Walt did say that Disney would continue to grow as long there was imagination left in the world. He was optimistic that Disney would be alright. Not everything is going to be exactly the same. And yes, Disney did bring us awesome new stuff after his death. It’s just that I’m not a fan of some of its later decisions.

Movies More For Adults

Sleeping Beauty

The animation is artistically eccentric and superb. The music is classical Tchaikovsky’s Sleeping Beauty sung by the amazing, operatic, angelic voice of Mary Costa. The writing is excellent. It’s the epitome of a classic fairytale, written for adults. Yet the story is ahead of its time. You have four strong female characters — the three good fairies and a villain, as well as a brave prince and an elegant princess. A damsel in distress she may be, Aurora is much more interesting than given credit for. Her characterization is rich, well-rounded and subtle. As a kid, I thought this was the most boring princess movie but now I can appreciate its sophisticated quality.

Pocahontas

I find that adults tend to like this movie more than kids. I myself was thoroughly impressed when I first watched it as an adult. It’s a beautiful movie that's beautifully done with beautiful animation, beautiful music, beautiful story. Everything about is just…beautiful. Adults who don’t like fluffiness will appreciate the bittersweet ending.

Fantasia

It’s an artsy-farty person’s orgasm. Classical symphony combined with thoughtful animation done by equally artsy-fartsy people, and no dialogue.

TangledYes I put Tangled on here. Don’t be fooled by the comedy and the bouncy characters. It's actually quite dark, like the villain herself. On the outside she appears harmless and likable, but on the inside, she’s dark and insidious. Likewise, the movie looks like a bubbly fairytale on the outside but it deals with the dark topic of abuse, especially insidious abuse.

Movies For Both Kids And Adults Equally

Mary PoppinsGrown up, I see how Mary Poppins actually has a lot of sneaky, dark (and possibly disturbing) things, like the banker laughing at the end and Mary Poppins (possibly drugging the kids??). Nonetheless, it’s still jolly enough for the kids to enjoy. Not to mention that the combined live action and animation within a scene was groundbreaking for its time.

Snow White and the Seven DwarfsKids will love singing heigh ho and fun songs along with the dwarves while adults will appreciate the historical significance of this cinematic masterpiece. As Walt’s very first full-length animated feature film, each frame is hand drawn with tender, loving care and is like a water colored painting.

Movies More For Kids

Emperor's New GrooveSorry, but this is just from my personal experience. I found this movie very funny as a kid but now I’m like meh.

Don’t forget the easter eggs snuck in to keep the adults entertained!

Walt had RESPECT for kids and adults, which shows through in his movies. In his time, there wasn't much respect for kids but Walt Disney turned that around.

“You're dead if you only aim for kids. Adults are just kids grown up anyways. Adults are interested if you don’t play down to the little 2 or 3 year olds or talk down. I don’t believe in talking down to children. I don’t believe in talking down to any certain segment. I like to kind of just talk in a general way to the audience. Children are always reaching.”

-Walt Disney

So the next time you find yourself fanning over a Disney movie, remember to not feel any guilt in your guilty pleasure cause Disney actually wants you to like them. That just means he did his job well.

That is all.

The Blogger

#disney #HallOfFame

I FINALLY saw Moana and happy to say that IT. WAS. AMAZING.

**SPOILERS.****SPOILERS.****SPOILERS.****SPOILERS.****SPOILERS.****SPOILERS.**

If you don’t want any spoilers, don’t read ahead. Go watch the movie now. I recommend you catch it in theaters while you can for the 3D experience.

This is less of a review and more of a selfish attempt to learn from the filmmaking technique of Moana. My goal is to learn what I like about the movies I like, so I can apply it myself.

When I first heard about Moana, I thought it was gonna be totally lame!! Girl wants one thing but parents want another? How cliche! That’s basically every other Disney movie done before. But it actually didn’t feel that cliche. They multitask – sing a catchy song that gives us the info we need (instead of batting it in our faces) while visually showing the rich Polynesian culture and story telling Moana’s growth. They did a similar thing with Mulan in “Honor to Us All”. A bad movie would have shown Moana and the parents face to face giving a boring long cliche speech about why they want her be the chief.

This just goes to show that it’s not just about the story, it’s about the execution. The plot isn’t super original and is a marriage of The Little Mermaid and Mulan. But hey, I love Mulan and The Little Mermaid so better they copy a good plot than a bad one. I’ve also heard there were some striking similarities with Raiders of the Lost Ark but I’ve never seen that or I don’t remember so I can’t say.

As I’ve said before, the setting is the one of the most important things in film because it's part of the execution and brings out the experience. The anthropomorphic ocean is original and takes advantage of the setting (brings out the essence of Polynesia) to tell the same story with a fresh, new experience. It’s why Titanic worked even though it’s pretty much modeled off Aladdin. The storyline is the same but bringing out the full potential of the setting – a boat – creates a whole new experience. It’s okay for a story to be simple as long as it’s executed well with visuals, music, etc.

Execution = setting —> experience

It’s OKAY to copy as long as you copy well. Sometimes the copier executes better than the copy-ee. JJ Abrams copied Spielberg’s ET ending in Super 8, but JJ’s execution was better than Spielberg’s in my opinion. It’s about the idea, then the execution.

Idea —> execution

Ideally though, I wouldn’t complain if Moana had come up with a completely original tale. That might be harder to do since there are essentially nine stories and most stories are just variations of those nine.

The “chosen one” trope is used heavily but I don’t mind too much cause I’m kind of a sucker for that.

I love Moana and Frozen because they’re adventurous. I’m kind of a sucker for movies where they go on big, exciting adventures.

A small issue I have is that strong girl-jerk guy combo that’s overused in newer Disney movies. It’s always the girl’s job to emotionally babysit the guy, pat him on the back and give him a big speech about what a special boy he is. Maui literally says, “Are you going to give me a speech?”, only for Moana to, well, literally give him a speech. So meta, Disney. Then they try to justify Maui’s jerkiness by giving him a super tragic backstory to woo the audience into feeling sorry for him. The only time the girl is the “jerk” or “broken” one is Elsa and that’s why I love her. She’s different from the other Disney female characters and more variety is good.

I don’t mind that Moana doesn’t have a prince. After all, this movie is about self discovery and a love story might distract from that. But what I hate is how fans think Moana is somehow BETTER solely because of her lack of prince. Woah, woah. Apparently even Mulan, MULAN I say, is no longer progressive enough for them because she has a prince. What?? Excuse me, but since when did having a love interest become unfeminist? We let our male heroes have romantic interests so why is it so horrible for a girl to find love? That’s horribly hypocritical and ironically unfeminist.

I don’t like Moana because her boyfriend is absent. I like her because she’s down-to-earth and adventurous like Ariel. She admits that she doesn’t know everything. Otherwise, she could easily have been a Mary Sue.

What I like about Moana is how it’s quietly feminist. Like Frozen, everyone is so CHILL about Moana being single and no one makes a big deal about it because that isn’t the point of the story. Moana’s problem is not that she’s oppressed by some patriarchy and her parents want her to marry. In fact, her dilemma is between two respectable positions and I find that refreshing and empowering. It would have worked too if the genders were reversed – a boy wanting to explore the sea but his parents wanting him to be chief.

NOTE: I know this sounds like I’m bashing the older Disney movies but I’m not. I love the older Disney movies but I’m just pointing out how I like that Moana is different.

The princess bashing in Moana is unnecessary, implying that being called a princess is patronizing. Princesses can be badass too (Mulan anyone??). Calling Moana and Merida the anti-princess, as if princesses needed an anti. As someone else mentioned, why can’t princesses of color have girly fun too? No need to attack the concept of princesses that's a beloved trademark of Disney. Maui is right. Anyone with a dress and an animal sidekick is a princess. That should be good thing! There's nothing wrong about that! Princesses are of high regal status. That shouldn’t be degrading.

The action scenes are unmemorable and the same as any Hollywood movie nowadays – more like busy work for the characters. The best action scene I’ve seen so far is in Frozen– which is artfully designed and has meaning to show the character’s emotions. I could watch that scene over and over again. Even the action scene in Beauty and the Beast is cinematic and artistic and Mulan’s action scenes are shorter, epic and more interesting to watch.

I wish we got to see Pua more. I could see why Hei Hei was on the trip because he was supposed to mirror Moana's self discovery. At the beginning people thought Hei Hei's rock swallowing was dumb, just like how the father disapproved of Moana's way-finding. But then they both proved themselves and found their purpose. Hei Hei proved that his rock swallowing hobby was useful because he protected the heart. They did that self-discovery thing with the Lava and Maui too, but with Maui, I felt it was unnecessary and boring to watch. I just wish they brought both Pua and Hei Hei along. I'd rather see Moana interact with her sidekicks than argue with Maui. We could have seen Pua develop too instead of watching Maui be a huge jerk.

Like Beauty and the Beast and The Lion King, the music is powerful, epic and amazing, though the lyrics are just okay and could use more work. The songs of earlier Disney movies had more poetic lyrics imho. This goes to show that great music can save a bad movie, or make an otherwise good movie even greater. As George Lucas once said, sound is the most important thing, like 50% of the movie or something like that. It's one of those soundtracks where the more you listen to it, the more you like it and want to listen to it even more.

It’s imaginative, epic, adventurous and a great watch.

That is all.

The Blogger

#movies #disney

Cinderella The most gorgeous silvery blue tapped with a spiral of glimmering magic our world's eyes are blessed to encounter. Combine all good things in this world and place it all on a dress. A shimmering masterpiece. Disney is legendary.

Ferris Bueller's Day Off That fringed jacket. That jewelry and attention to detail.

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Never was there an outfit so feminine and badass at once.

What outfits from movies do you love? Comment below!

That is all, The Blogger

#movies #fashion #HallOfFame

Courtesy of the Disney princesses.

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Beautiful like watercolor

Cinderella Shades of blue gorgeously put together. I certainly appreciate the quality and classiness of “So This is Love” more than I did as a kid.

Sleeping Beauty Geometric pattern also used in Pocahontas

The Little Mermaid

Beauty and the Beast A true cinematic masterpiece. Even the scary scenes look hauntingly artistic and beautiful.

Aladdin

Pocahontas Unparalleled cinematography with multiple colors. A beautifully made movie. Fun fact: Pocahontas and The Lion King were released around the same time. Disney thought that Pocahontas would do better, so they had their A-animators on Pocahontas and B-animators on The Lion King. Explains the stunning animation. It took unusually long to finish Pocahontas because of coordinating of the multiple colors.

Mulan They aimed for “poetic simplicity.”

The Princess and the Frog The simplicity of “Almost There” is brilliant.

Tangled Look at all the vibrant colors

Frozen With its beautiful wintery blues and purples

That is all.

The blogger

#disney

I normally don't like movies that are too plot-driven. They make you focus too much on the plot that it takes away from just enjoying the moment.

A story has plot, character, setting and theme. Great books are focused on characters. Great movies are focused on setting (imho). A movie can take advantage of the visual aspect of the setting in a way that a book can't. Meanwhile, books can use words to richly describe a character’s inner life in ways that movies can't. Usually, movies that try to get into the character's thoughts/emotions linger and risk being corny. That said, there are movies with well-developed characters and present them in a way that's entertaining for a movie.

I believe that what makes a good movie is using the setting to its full advantage. The key is having conversations in interesting locations (or places that have character), instead of using boring conversation shots over and over again (yes, that means you Gossip Girl and tons of other TV shows/movies that are guilty of this). If I see something like this again, I'll literally go berserk.

1. Super 8 JJ Abrams is brilliant in this scene. By using a commonplace setting of one's childhood, he goes row by row of the 7-Eleven store while the characters are having their conversation. 7-Eleven might seem like an ordinary place but that's what characterizes that time period. Just like how we associate milkshake diners with the 50s and get all nostalgic about it (thanks Grease), JJ Abrams is romanticizing the shit out of 7-Eleven, making it look like an icon of the that time period. Someday, future generations might get nostalgic for 7-Eleven and our time period. JJ Abrams, you are a genius. Too bad this scene was deleted.

2. Easy A Reading the script for Easy A, it seemed like a boring movie with the characters just talking, but the director made it entertaining by having the conversations in scenic locations, focusing on setting.

When talking about your life's problems, be sure to do it over a scenic hill in California.

Like Super 8, make an ordinary location seem interesting.

Why not have a scene at the pool? Keep it interesting.

3. Twilight This scene, my favorite scene, wasn't in the book, but they added it in because it matched the essence of Twilight.

The prom scene was originally supposed to be in the gym, but Catherine Hardwick decided that was too “unromantic!” so prom outdoors in the gazebo it was.

That is all.

The Blogger

#movies

Missing HIMYM? Here are seven episodes you should re-watch to fill that HIMYM nostalgia void in your heart.

The First Three Episodes

No duh- that's when we were first introduced to the iconic blue french horn (which shall be beautifully repeated in future episodes) and got to know the characters, like Barney's legen-wait for it-dary catchphrase!

The Slutty Pumpkin: Season 1, Episode 6

“Because it tasted like an alcoholic tootsie roll!”

The Pineapple Incident: Season 1, Episode 10

Ah, the iconic pineapple.

Girls vs. Suits: Season 5, Episode 12

When Ted almost meets the mother and Barney's legendary number happens.

Subway Wars: Season 6, Episode 4

This episode takes advantage of the NYC city landscape with epic-ness.

Have a legendary day.

The blogger

#himym