Von Neumann’s Elephant (part one)
“I like its obscurity so that we can play about with it—interpret it different ways, and the beauty and fantasticallity of the details—the butterflies and the elephant, for instance.”
VIRGINIA WOOLF, in a letter to V. Sackville-West dated 15 September 1924
If the dream is a translation of waking life, waking life is also a translation of the dream. He wrote me: what I am about to show you is not a dream in the conventional sense. This has nothing to do with those vague impressions we experience while sleeping, but with what nocturnal dreaming suggests: the possibility of dreaming in our waking life.
The power of a country road is different when one is walking along it from when one is flying over it by airplane. In the same way, the power of a text is different when it is read from when it is copied out.
Von Neumann’s Elephant describes a problem in recreational mathematics: the challenge is to construct a planar curve in the shape of an elephant using only four arbitrary parameters. The origin of this stunt is a (possibly apocryphal) discussion between physicists John von Neumann and Enrico Fermi. One day the pair were sunning themselves next to the large pool at the hotel in Montreux where their friend, Vladimir Nabokov, was living. While sipping a watermelon daiquiri from a tall glass wrapped with a delicate pink towelette, Von Neumann said (quite out of the blue or perhaps he was resuming a conversation they’d begun earlier when they were out sailing), “Why so many input parameters, Enrico? Your calculations suffer from an overfitting problem.” Enrico Fermi was silent for a moment, then decided to go on the attack by asking, “So John, how many arbitrary parameters do you use for your calculations?” After considering this rallying gambit, Von Neumann replied, “With four parameters I can fit an elephant, and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.” Enrico was about to inquire about which genre of pachyderm Von Neumann had in mind when Vladimir Nabokov presented himself in short pants that showed off his dimpled knees. Nabokov waved a butterfly net and said, “Wiggle this, Johnny Boy!”
Later that night, at the hotel bar, the three of them tricked out in elaborately embroidered dinner jackets, Nabokov told his friends that they were wasting their time solving simple problems with such a limited number of fixed parameters. “The real world, the world in which we live, is one vast nonequilibrium system.” “Vladimir is right, Enrico,” said Von Neumann. “Forget fitting elephants whose trunks wiggle at the invocation of five parameter functions! What we really need is a Theory of Nonelephants!”
Putting Von Neumann’s Elephant in plainer terms: rationality, rational logic in the form of mathematics is adequate to prove anything. The only limitation is the actual, what is. But here distinctions are made. On what basis do we say “this is” and “this is not”? Rationality will help anyone uncomfortable with the possible objectivity of their experience of an image that appears in the imagination by saying, “Oh yes. That happens under the circumstances where matter does such & such…” What I experience in my imagination is like what happens in Las Vegas. So the point of contention is shifted to what is defined as fundamental, what is defined as objective. We say that our dreams, as are our thoughts, are private experiences … they are not out there in the world … but what do we really mean by that? What purpose does it serve to make such a distinction between inner and outer?
Would insideness versus outsideness be the ontological category against which objects, things, actions, events and relative stabilities stand out? Only in science fiction does an absolute distinction between inner and outer appear as a serious object of discourse in a hotel bar in Montreux. Even novelists draw their imagery from science fiction, but without really realizing that they are doing so.
“Even a Theory of Nonelephants should be in part a very particular species of detective novel, in part a kind of science fiction,” said Nabokov to his two friends. One of his dimpled knees, now hidden under a crease of black satin, was bent beneath the mahogany bar top.
“Ah yes, the theory of nonelephants or a theory without elephants!” said Enrico Fermi. “Tell us more, Johnny. We’re all ears.” And in saying this, Fermi placed his hands near his ears and flapped them (the hands) while swinging an extemporized and imaginary trunk which all three men saw with utter clarity.
The elephant is the fact, the stable thing, the repeatable thing, the proper subject of actual science. What we encounter in nonequilibrium systems, systems that are constantly changing in complex ways, is that actual science can’t cope. And what we learn from physical systems with large numbers of particles is that new stable forms emerge from the chaos. At higher levels of reality, new fundamental forms come into being which cannot be accounted for by any microscopic theory. The macroscopic world will always contain or manifest phenomena that are not reducible to more fundamental descriptions made of elements appropriate to the lower level.
Science fiction or, rather, fictional science. Actual science asks how? Fictional science asks why & what? I knew from day one of my general physics course that I wanted to study fictional science: why is there gravity? what is it? Actual science only deals with time, and the specific form of time known as mechanical time, the time that corresponds to the functioning of clocks. Fictional science (a branch of theology perhaps) deals not only with time, but with eternity. But fictional science does not (should not!) stop at eternity, but it also considers (perhaps even functions in) the untimely.
For my next trick I will write a book with the title Von Neumann’s Elephant, a book that begins with an acknowledgement of weakness: (as Deleuze says) one can only write about what one doesn’t know or knows badly … we must write at the frontiers of knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from ignorance and transforms one into the other.
Von Neumann’s Elephant
No one will remember what sort of creature Von Neumann’s elephant was unless they conceive of it as a complicated hygienic service belonging to everyone (probably something like “spray & wash”). I remember a time when such people wanted to know what the world was like before the acid snow began. A problem in recreational math assumes a position in which we place dominoes on end in complex patterns so that in tipping one … all are there to fall. No, he was not a professional repeater. Repetition was his avocation : a way of constantly moving forward … all those photographs of clouds consisted in constructing a planar region whose borders will be placed in a final position once … of the rest, the leftovers (lagniappe) … for all he could tell, it was like one of those opportunistic curves that come in the shape of an elephant. The parasitic fish into which they will press needles form regular arrays of polygons and feed off excretions from only four fixed parameters. In the End of Times, fish will settle down. In general, a unit of dynamic viscosity, will exert a tangential force of one dyne per square centimeter causing a velocity change of one centimeter per second between two parallel planes separated by one centimeter in a liquid … the bodies of beached leviathans originated from a discussion about what to do with the quantities of discarded plastic … for the whole system ,, considering : it’s better to use a paper straw or a washable straw that you can carry with you in your pocket or purse … but even though sometimes your musical offerings will approximate small epiphanies … disagreements between physicists over slight displacements in volume may set the hygienic service into an uncontrolled spiral, but just so they … Von Neumann and Enrico Fermi both took up the problem of the whole assemblage of needles, each figuring they could busily polish up dangling polynomial expressions which some authors invoke. Fermi’s friend, John von Neumann, readjusted the parameters so that the equation fit the available data to perfection. They congratulated themselves. We will not be sidelined by passing trends! We are not those who, when asked how many hide from the Great Santa, reply with figurative statements! Our only concern is for the advancement of Philistines whose arbitrary parameters are used as a form of currency. Now it’s all spent, how do we know that everything little birds feed on will not be consumed by calculations? Von Neumann replied by holding up four fingers. His one man show once lasted for hours and is now the property of a collector who lives in Berlin or perhaps London. The joke was that Von Neumann once claimed he cleaned the teeth of crocodiles with only three fixed parameters, before boasting, “I can fit an elephant up the Great Santa’s backside!” These are lines of credit that the Good Witch Glinda drew upon when consulting the Great Record that wrote itself. The Wicked Witch of the Wild West screamed, “With five I can make Von Neumann wiggle his willy!” Bad witch! His are maxed out now and we have reached our limit. Sand witch! Is that your real trunk? By this, he meant that there are limits beyond which there’s no end. To a praying person, when he asks her if family simulations relied on one lump or two … It’s back there somewhere, isn’t it? There is nothing left in the cabinet. Is she a Good Witch or Bad Witch? How many input parameters would you need to … At the sight of the Great Santa, she says, “Oh I’m not a witch at all!”
The impossibility of repetition presupposes an overfitting of bodies with our hands. “Why should I repeat myself? I’m Dorothy Gale from Kansas!” At the time (September, a time for beginning novels, even short ones), I was conducting research for a book about L. Frank Baum, the creator of Oz and the author of the first fourteen Oz books … “L.” stands for Lyman, a name that Frank Baum disliked, but not enough to efface it completely. Even though I loiter at the edges of academia, I’ve never endured an official academic appointment, though I’m told I would be a dynamic lecturer because of my theatrical background. I am a failed actor who succeeded in avoiding politics completely. One never knows … what interested me were phenomena that were related to the problem of explosive death. If we die before the eyes of the Great White Santa and not the Wicked Witch of the East, how can we possibly define our core complex numbers in terms that both Santa & Wicked Easty recapitulate? When I posed such problems at unofficial seminars conducted in the Japan Room or the Zulu Room of the Student Union, everyone would rise, bursting into spontaneous applause. “This figure that I’ve drawn on the chalkboard represents merely a cross-section of what Von Neumann’s Elephant could be if only we would believe.” This is an example of something I would say to break the silence of their gazes. I am the sort of person whose friends and lovers are quick to say: “He’s a real pain in the ass.” The use of compass directions in Baum’s universe to indicate good & evil: our hands were raised toward the North, the Realm of Glinda the Good. A sentinel stands erect, arm outstretched pointing in a direction that’s not South. Let us all draw elephantine shapes on figurative chalkboards.
During one of these informal seminars, a poet, a student of the great Álvaro de Campos, herself now an elderly woman, Loana Marina Waldenstein, made her final public appearance. You laugh—but it’s true! One of my volunteer students asked if her real name was Gertrude Wallenbeck, and after waving away an imaginary gnat, she agreed to read a selection from her biography of De Campos. The passage she read concerned a conversation De Campos had with his master Alberto Caeiro on the subject of repetition. Waldenstein recorded what De Campos wrote that Caeiro said, “We should read everything as if for the first time, because it really is the first time we are reading something even if it is something we read everyday.” As an example, Caeiro claimed that he read the Forty-second Sonnet of Shakespeare every single day.
That thou hast her, it is not all my grief,
And yet it may be said I loved her dearly;
That she hath thee, is of my wailing chief,
A loss in love that ouches me more nearly.
Loving offenders, thus I will excuse ye:
Thou dost hove her, because thou know’st I love her;
And for my sake even so doth she abuse me,
Suffering my friend for my sake to approve her.
If I lose thee, my loss is my love’s gain,
And losing her, my friend hath found that loss;
Both find each other, and I lose both twain,
And both for my sake lay on me this cross:
But here’s the joy; my friend and I are one;
Sweet flattery! then she loves but me alone.
“I could read this poem every day and I would never read the same poem,” said Caeiro. “The poem is not just what is on the page but it is also what’s inside me, the poem’s reader.” To which, Waldenstein reports, De Campos replied, “A poem is thus the river in which Heraclitus bathed each morning of his life.”
Our loan words bias rising & falling textual interest levels as our hands form animal shapes whose natural home is the African Savannah. That we were ever really in western Kansas subsequently became an active food group. Why is it that we, with our hands pointing this way and that, will be nowhere at all at the same time? This could be a research subject for recreational slaves of the Great White Santa or the Great White Santa could give paid holidays to the members of his “work force.” The same thing could be said for Oklahoma. Listening to mathematics broadcast on shortwave radio hoisted up out of us the junk food that we had lived by. Little Dotty understood from the annunciated functional equations that she would go in search of the Time Crystal that was quickly vanishing from our lives. Before we will become miserable somewhere in this strange world, we will learn that the whole point was to look good without any clothes on. Yes, she was desperate but she will at least see a place where she can stand proudly upon a rounded stone. An angel had gone to sleep there on the couch in the front room and was able to carry on watching TV happy with lots of old friends to dream about. Then she woke up and flew away because she’d dreamed that the true purpose of art was to teach one how to be alone. It is thanks to our Big Screens that we don’t want to experience reality as a tiny resonating sphere. It’s a little crazy to think that just a few decades ago, little screens and high-speed muscle cars were places where Lady Godiva’s flower children danced and played. She pushed up her nose at Dotty’s vacuum despite the fact that the kitchen needed mopping. Why can’t the floor stay clean? Dotty asked. Let’s put the vacuum cleaner inside and wait for our unlimited data plans to mature. Amen! The present world is not the past precisely because our supply of superfluid helium 3 is trapped in moonrock. Suppose that we use conventional cryogenic techniques … what then? For an extra two points: Time Crystals are commonly classified as hazardous materials by which international watchdog organization? But an internal study revealed … an eternal world where past results do not indicate future magnetic compass directions …
“a contagion of elephants”
I’ve been reading Roberto Bolaño for more than twenty years now, but we had a falling out early on, a silly dispute, completely my fault ,, I couldn’t really blame Bolaño, how could I since it wasn’t his fault that his books created (for him : ?) a second life … the books appeared to be writing themselves. That books should behave this way (I was … a form of intinction … dipped in a bowl of jealousy, envy soup : I too wished for my books to write themselves … did I really?) … if I typed furiously for the next ten years (a form of typing practice inspired not just by Bolaño, but by Jack Kerouac, one of the greatest American typists who ever lived ,, look at him go, man!) it was so that … I too was constructing a golem in my subterranean atelier, a ten-fingered golem that could go on typing long after I’d leveled-up in the Great Game.
We made up, Bolaño and I, when 2666 was published in English, but it was a cool friendship until we got drunk together at that bar-café in … where he confessed to me his savage & true woes. Since then, Bolaño and I have been like brothers.
Poetry bound us together. I didn’t realize it at first. His seeming earnestness was really passion, a belief in the deeper sense of wanting it to be true : that Poetry was not the property of grammarians, but a transformative force that would reshape the world ,, that Poetry was the acid solution capable of dissolving the Wicked Witch of the West.
If Bolaño & I had never met, would I have become a poet? That’s difficult to say … there are other universes. But the fact (here) is that ,, if I became a poet, he certainly played a role, guiding me. And Jack Paradise too, of course, with his Tom-Baker hairdo and old Navy pea-sea coat, pipe clenched in his teeth (+ smoke rings), ol’ Capt’n Jack, my Capt’n. I wanted Poetry to have been as important to the Fisher Kings, but when we were in our twenties, our eyes were full of novels, poems were for …
Where I’m going with this :: there are two directions in time pointing from “You Are Here” and that’s one pointing back beyond the limit of History and one pointing forward to the Future, Post-History. Now (as we all know) there are forces which aim to keep us firmly locked in History, that big room. The key is hidden in plain sight, but it’s disguised : it looks like poetry, it quacks like poetry, but it ain’t Poetry. Robert Graves knew that and so did Roberto Bolaño and his band of Infrarealists. Graves reminds us that before Prose, there was true (original) Poetry, Poetry that was language unbound, before writing systems, Stone Age Poetry, the vestiges of which are detectable still in myth (in Legends & Labyrinths). What the Infrarealists knew was that this Poetry isn’t just behind us, we don’t have to invent a Time Machine and go back, this same Poetry is our future, it is the key that will unlock the room of History and bring us to the Promised Land in which we are really & truly free. Like Benjamin Péret said when being interrogated by the Brazilian police: Elephants are contagious.
A poet about to write a poem … the root of misunderstandings can be plotted in either dimension, along the easy axis or easy plane defined by nulla dies sine linea and a point particle. A poet is present when they go out into the neighborhood of powerful hard axis magnets … PDF’d or Instapapered … a poem can, in fact, write itself : ? Science then, according to my informal investigation machine, begins when propositions are bookmarked or liked. When snow is still falling, fictional science is poised to become reality if the magnet’s needle wiggles in a five parameter vector space. As we survey—my diary gossip—and the words, language on the web (copied & wasted), enact Christian Bök’s prediction for the poetics of an imaginary science : “The tyranny of truth has increased our esteem for the lie and the tyranny of reason has increased our esteem for the absurd such that the praxis of Vogon science always involves the praxis of Vogon poetry … and see if I don’t.”
The acid snow, actual this time, in a new direction … the work to fertilize is more delightful : I saw before the magnetization fell, that the charm of an elephant is not in the study of plants. The diaries I read by other writers came to a resting point between the lines parallel or perpendicular to the rejection of false ideas. When managed as information, she would lie down in the snow and make angels.
Monday 30
We called ourselves The Highlanders because that was the name of the coffee shop where we met, hung out, studied, chatted, killed time, etc. A subfaction of our group (Travis Harrington, Isabel Medina, Mark Puig, & Lyra Toscani) had agitated for the name “The Diagnosticians” since (the argued) the true function of the poet was to diagnose the ills of culture & society, but it was The Highlanders that stuck.
To have called ourselves The Bellringers would have been inspired since we spent as much (if not more time) in The Chimes, across the street, drinking beer, eating crawfish étouffée and hushpuppies (on Sundays coz in those days you could drink beer on the Lord’s Day without eating hushpuppies : two for a dollar). If I ever write a fictional account of our days together there & then I will call us The Bellringers … ask not for whom … right?
I won’t pretend to know anything beyond the fact that I wanted to be a poet. We all wanted to be poets, the sort of poets who would write novels and screenplays too coz a poet’s gotta eat … and drink!! So a lot of effort went into figuring out how to write novels that would sell. Peter even ran an evening course for us based on “The Writer’s Journey” : this formula is guaranteed. … but I had some half-baked ideas based on my study of the Gospels and a careful reading of the Acts of the Apostles.
“No, it’s all right there in the Bible,” I said to Lonnie. She wasn’t my girlfriend, but she’d crashed on my couch a few times and I’d seen her naked. Lonnie said I was full of shit, but I could quote scripture and verse. “Jesus was a communist and so were the early disciples. They held everything in common, no private property, you see.”
“Jesus wasn’t a commie,” said Lonnie. “Communism didn’t even exist back then.”
“Okay, fine,” I said. “Jesus was an anarchist. It was only later, after Christianity became the official religion of the Empire that Jesus got turned into the King of Kings.”
“Give it up,” said Lonnie. “Communism doesn’t work.”
“Capitalism doesn’t work,” I said.
Then Lonnie drug out that old argument about how if people weren’t forced to work to earn a living, they’d sit around on their lazy asses all day and do nothing. I rolled my eyes. “You got it all wrong,” I said. “It’s capitalism that forces people to be lazy and sit on their asses all day long. Most work is bullshit. People are willing to work if that work is meaningful and connected in some tangible way to providing what they need … and I’m not just talking about material conditions either, but spiritual ones. That’s what Jesus meant when he said, ‘Consider the lilies of the fields…’”.
I envied Ernesto Santiago who wasn’t a poet, but a literary critic or maybe he was more of a literary fanboy. Ernesto nestled in the umbra of Walker Percy and the penumbra of Charles Peirce. My long conversations with Ernesto at Highland were extremely educational. I was studying physics and had done my undergraduate work at a small Roman Catholic college where the core curriculum was made up of the so-called “Great Books”. I knew Plato, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, and St. Augustine backwards and forwards, but I’d never even heard of Jacques Derrida, Deleuze & Guattari, or even Roland Barthes. Ernesto must have thought I was a complete yokel even if I could rattle off all of the 137 Fragments of Heraclitus. Because I was studying to be a scientist, Ernesto thought it wise to begin my education with Michel Foucault, his book, The Order of Things. So began my four years of intense reading of French Theory. It was right when I was about to complete my Ph.D. when Alan Sokal revealed his hoax. Ernesto and I read all the exchanges in Social Text and (while I’ll admit that my initial feeling was unease ,, concern that maybe the Emperor of French Theory was butt-naked) I decided that the joke was on Sokal, not French Theory. We don’t have to do an exegesis of that episode of “intellectual history” to get where I ended up in 1997 with a newly minted Ph.D. in physics and some serious questions about what I was really supposed to be doing. I mean, I wanted to be a poet. I was a poet, and now I had a way to earn my bread. I was reading books like Anti-Oedipus and laughing my ass off thinking, hey! why can’t physics be this fun? Have you ever browsed through an issue of Nature or Science? Talk about unreadable! … well, maybe not unreadable, but certainly not any fun : where was the analysis explicating the Q-ness of the P-ness in conjunction with the B-ness of the A-ness : ?? All the writing that scientists did fell into two categories: apologetics and reports. Either they were trying to dumb things down so anyone could understand it (popular science writing, a form of cheerleading) or they were talking to each other about their latest breakthroughs and discoveries in a language that very few people could understand. What I wanted to read though was the Anti-Oedipus of physics. Who had written such a book? Why didn’t physicists have journals like Social Text? Journals that you could actually sit down and read and profitably get something out of? Poetry and science have to be brought back together, fused into a single discipline, I said to Ernesto. He shook his head. It can’t be done. That would be squaring the circle. We’ll see about that, I said.
“the Oklahoma sky”
a huge snow angel with great … Look! she said. A new direction emerges whenever we stand at the highest symmetry axis of the future in which we are free : they will tell you that “it’s not true” that “it isn’t science” that “where’s the profit?” ,, belief is the desire to get to that destination : but it could be true, if we work for it … birds and rivers and hills ,, everything : only a place with flowers … and the distant dark star ,, Oh I cut the cherry tree down in 1956, it uses a different set of design parameters. There is no need to light up every campfire respectively. Silver falls in the winter, gold falls in autumn. Dottie lies down in the snow next to Wilbur … sweeping wings. The spring snow of the cottonwoods … what are you doing in here on such a beautiful day! I picked up all the heads and put them back in the order I’d heard about from friends. Plucked from the Suggestion Box and parsed more than they were read. A roll of the dice is worth two on the road … as the road turns … these are the days when we are alive and still on a new trajectory that leads us to Oz : traveling through a graveyard with a suitcase full of honey-colored sparks. Another form in the world, just trying to find a way to visit Dotty’s devilishly playful snow angel, a call back number written on the inside hem of a long white dress that she had made instead of requesting prior authorization. The single compass we carry will point us to the arrowheads along buffalo trails. Place your hand on the wound to feel tomorrow what could be felt today when she was small and moving her legs out and in, across a field of many magnetic completion points. Dottie & Wilbur made snow angels inline with current design practice. Once, I decided to live in a place that would seem contrary to an active computing space … it might not right now, but in the future it could … she had even scooped up the needles, large and small, and flung them into the Oklahoma sky before Wilbur had a chance to hang the halo. Turn and go back in throbbing pain. No assumption about diaries. We don’t make use of only the top of our heads. Out in the snow around ,, along the track (on the Other Side) : they said she was a runaway. Down! Back the way you came! Do you need to see its root structure to know that a diary is always written for an audience that doesn’t want to read? Those factors that influence one another in continuing to make the world ugly : he just talks and talks and talks to himself. Shout a warning to the nations! Even a murderous place … honey, have you seen my sword of God? A tree lies dying. I renounce Oklahoma’s turnpikes. Here we are, in a place where only some are able to swing the image of footsteps in the snow … I’m just trying to find a way to you : footprints all over the snow lead to far points we don’t understand. There is something in this. Heavy booted footprints, passive, vain and cruel : none hung so freely as those who hang from the Oklahoma sky. As we approach the end of the Web … impossible to find anything written by direct perturbations in the system. All our search engines direct us to authorized (monetized) sources … Wikipedia entries repacked, rewrapped, AI-enhanced … nothing new … Babylon, that mighty city … history has lost its most private frame, a form that suggests we should get to the next click. The reason lies in both fantasy and society, a tornado struck causing significant damage to history. We are gripped by trees and power lines. Towers fall to make our own private histories. But this begs the question: have we placed ourselves in the position of saving those who are broken in the dust? Deluded by fantasy, our own … Oklahoma’s turnpikes are a collective fantasy of the existential car chase challenge. It is through these several methods of the noir mystery writer that necessarily distinguish one turnpike from another. Each turnpike involves a mainline, modern Western, a dystopian allegory of fantasy and history wherever sidegate toll plazas lead to our surveillance society. No matter what uses to which they are put, we pay in cashless datastreams … a kind of love letter to the musical ear somewhere between the earth & the Oklahoma sky.
The happiest day in all my outer life! let me tell you a story ,, risking going back too far since such scenes are exacted from the archive with the dark triangular eye of the time scoop. The day ,, the day !!
Picture the farm anyway you like, this is your story too. What I see is the old shed full of tools that belonged to my great-grandfather (I knew him not, alas) and lumber / at the end of the garden of delights is where I found her …
and half-way between (around his middle where the serpent was … that night in the chicken house when he reached in to gather the eggs for the next morning’s omelet / sautéed yellow oyster mushrooms — an earthly aroma — and cheddar cheese made of milk from Blackie the Guernsey cow) the old chicken house and a dilapidated barn with a rusting tin roof — that old barn! is the scene of a bitter comedy where on the southside was a small corral where each morning (with my grandfather — I knew him well) we fed the cattle and there was a metal stock where the milk cow, a Guernsey named Blackie, would stand and munch alfalfa pellets while I squeezed jets of warm milk from her teets into a stainless bucket — (each an
Eden in itself) I found a small red wheelbarrow — so much depends upon / this red wheelbarrow (a conveyance) / glazed with rainwater / beside the whitewashed chicken house : the rest of the farm center ended up under a foot of snow again, this time playing dot dot dot with the dotty lady writing doodles in black ink on her white white white skin in daylight. Somewhere echoing
quite the most
extraordinary,
the most unheard of
and undreamed of, / humorously,
daintily, exquisitely fascinating object
I had ever come across in all
my brief existence … thus far!
“writing” which is like “real” life—as it is lived from hour to hour, day to day, cannot be a novel! acid snow is an impossibility! #NL002VNE