If your feminism defaults to heterosexual feminist analyses of male privilege from within heterosexual households where adult men own children and adult women in patriarchal contracts of marriage and paternity any time you have to think about gay men, who as a class are notably less likely to do that and whose relationships with women, men, and society broadly render that framework's understanding of “male” and “privilege” incoherent, your lesbian-feminism honestly sounds pretty useless? I'm just not very interested in any other results that level of gender analysis yields.
Even before we discuss effeminacy, faggotry, 'un-men,' catamites, the phenomenon of 'straight' as a gendered distinction between a man and the other man he has asymmetric sex with and so on, if you can't recognize that the “conventionally masculine” cis gay man who serves as a bogeyman in so much naive faggotry-exempt gay politics has a concretely, economically, materially-different relationship to women from straight men... your gender analysis is idealist and unimpressive.