En Ru

LinkedIn: @li-enru | Instagram: @li.enru

A few weeks ago I had coffee with three wonderful minds, two innocently eager, and one blazing with purpose. I'm sharing as much as I can remember what we've discussed that day.

We met up to talk about the book Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World, by David Epstein. It was organised by Dr Noor Affizan – a brilliant lady with a big heart who wants to see the youngsters around her do well. She's more than that of course, but that's what I admired about her most (You can know her more here). She wanted to share and discuss what's in the book after being “blown away” by the ideas presented.

Our discussion eventually moved on to self-development in general and touched on topics like building habits, personal values, and even entrepreneurship. But, admittedly, what I was more surprised with was the fact that there would be such a meet-up in Brunei.

The book

David Epstein argues the need for more generalists as much as (and maybe even more) it needs specialists, and that most of the top performers in the world don't specialise early on in their life.

It argues that dabbling in different fields makes you more capable in whatever field you finally end up pursuing; How – in many fields – you would do better when you have knowledge from other fields too.

That afternoon, Dr Affizan shared the experience of her residency in Singapore, and how the book described her work experience there. From how those who only studied and do well academically can't perform well in a real-life clinical situation because of a lack of experience in other aspects of life.

That motivated her to bring this idea to more Bruneians, especially students and young adults who may think that specialisation is the road to success in the modern world.

And how, like the book says, many of us are pressured (by our teachers, parents, even ourselves) to lock in the course of our life in our teenage years. Epstein emphasised that we should be fine trying out before deciding what we want to stick with, and two decades of living is usually not enough for most people to truly know what we really want.

Really, even if you got another 20 years, it shouldn't lock you into one field for life. As difficult and uncomfortable as it is, the best kind of mindset is to give ourselves permission to delve into a new interest at any point in our life.

Connecting the book to Brunei

I shared with her how while I was in university, UBD has the GenNext programme with the intention to give undergraduates a breadth of skills, but most of us felt it was a waste of student's time and energy. We just want to get it out of the way and focus on our core modules.

In such situations, I asked, would the students benefited from the GenNext programme?

She believes it would, even if the students were not aware of what's being done for them. The knowledge and insights would still stick with the students as they specialise. It will come back to help them in the form of insights like coming up with analogies.

Her main worry for Bruneian is the lack of curiosity or hunger to grow, which is crucial to anyone, not just the local youths. You have to be curious or hungry enough in the first place: that's the main drive for a person to sample different knowledge, skillset, or industry. That's how generalists appear.

To me, it is very familiar, my ex-boss talks about this a lot whenever she looks at hiring new team members. She has taught me a lot in my self-development and personal growth.

So, when it comes to us Bruneians, maybe it is due to our reliance on “systems” that have been put in place for us, taught to us by our elders. A system, as in a belief that there's a set path for us already in our life, and we just have to put effort into completing the list of tasks.

From beliefs like “being a good student means you get a stable job in your 20s”, to “do your work properly and you'll be able to marry by X years old”, the underlying premise is that some things will happen because of another. These are not written in stone. Like that false logical causality of “if you don't have a pen, you'll die a sad lonely death.”

Maybe this is due to how our culture is. From religion to our educational assessment system, everything implied that “here's a set of rules, now try to finish this stage. We'll move on to the next stage after this.”

It gives a certain comfort and complacency to know there's a “next stage” that's already been prepared. It gives the illusion that life is a straight line that only ever goes upwards.

It's even reinforced to some extent by how success stories are always told as if everything that happened were meant to be meaningful and relevant, when in fact, the storyteller actually only brought up the few events that matter to the story. He or she would omit irrelevant details or details that might weaken his objectives of telling that story. Without being intentional, it gives the audience an impression of success being “tidier” than it actually is.

Everyone does it, and it's not to serve some nefarious purposes. It's just the nature of storytelling. This might be partly due to limitations in verbal storytelling as a medium of communication: It's easier to tell a story by omitting out the boring, messy, “unimportant” things that don't move the story forward.

That usually meant brushing past from mentioning the efforts, the struggles, the pain and doubts, and the detours in life that didn't end up as a stepping stone to be memorialised. It meant storytelling discounted the failures we have had in life that told us “nope, not this way. Turn around, try another direction.”

“Nice guys don't finish last”

Naturally, when you are given the green light to “try out lots of things and see if you like any of them”, we felt only prudent to ask how we can determine if we're being too stubborn when we should have just quit and try something else? Who knows, this might be your actual calling/passion and you might just be a hair's breadth away from the most important day of your work life?

That how we got into the topic of learning about ourselves by identifying our core values and using them as our compass.

Dr Affizan shared with us the ideas of thought leaders like Simon Sinek, Victor Frankl, Susan David, and Stephen Covey.

To briefly put it, we just got to make sure our actions are based on our values, and that get our self-worth based on living out these values. It's got to do with being aware with the intention behind our actions and decisions, too.

That lead to a discussion on how living our life and being successful in the world basically boils down to just giving values to others. A.k.a Just be a good person.

From aeons ago, mankind has always been reminded to remain unflinching to virtues and always reflect on ourselves to see where we can improve further. From the idea of self-reflection, treating others well, to perseverance and consistency – there are many familiar concepts and call-to-action.

We touched on the idea of abundance and growth mindset, and how the perspective of the world affects people's reasoning. I don't know if they understand what I was trying to say: I see that from a certain perspective, greed or selfishness can be an incentive to create a gentler and better world.

That's because those who think of the economy as a zero-sum game would never choose to cooperate. While those who see the economy expanding forever would find it crazy to spend energy slowing others down – they would be busy cooperating to increase each others' profit.

As for selfishness...

Spirituality and what religion teaches us

Afterwards, I met with a friend who studied psychology. At one point in our conversation, I asked whether “fake it til you make it” can also apply to mindset, not just habits. He said yes: By surrounding ourselves with people with positive thoughts.

He also shared about the feel-good chemicals in our brain that gets released when we perform selfless acts – they stimulate dopamine, oxytocin and serotonin. It won't be released if we are calculative with our action.

He concluded that a lot of scientific research actually proves the wisdom of many religious teachings.

This was also a comment I echoed earlier in the afternoon: it seems that the values uphold by religions still remain pathways to success in a modern secular world.

It was really a thought-provoking afternoon. I can't recall the last time I felt that pumped up within such a short time. Dr Affizan wants to share more big ideas to more people, and I hope this post can do its part in that movement.

If you've read all the way here, please reach out to me and tell me what you think!

There are sounds that remind you of certain memories. Then, there's music and ambience that just brings you back to years gone by.

I used to visit taverns every night back in my university years. Every town or city I've been to, no exception.

There's more than just the food, drinks, or bards.

I'd be sneaking around the cupboard, the kitchens, stealing cheese, pulling a basket over people's heads and pickpocketing them.

Not that I'm good at it. But the quick load button is the best invention in gaming.

(I'm talking about Skyrim.)

I always believe that we can understand the same concept ever deeper when we repeatedly hear it described by different people. So I'm sharing this Chinese article on something you may have known before, but may you gain a deeper comprehension by the end of it.

-

(Translated and summarised from: https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/34081489)

The Three Outlooks are the outlook on life, values, and world outlook. In layman's terms, the outlook on life is how a person should live in his life; values ​​are what is most precious in a person’s life; and the world outlook is what the world is like.

When asked “Which condition is most important to a partner” (one of the sections in a survey done in China), the Three Outlooks unanimously defeated personality, appearance, and finance, ranking first.

Many people were surprised by this result, but when you think about it carefully, the Three Outlooks are really important.

In regards to having agreement in the Three Outlooks, it does not require that your interests, preferences and ways of thinking be exactly the same; but that you can seek a common ground while reserving differences, and know how to tolerate, understand and appreciate.

Otherwise, when you share happiness with him, he would think you are showing off; when you and him talk about sadness, he thinks you are hypocritical. It’s tiring to get along with people who don’t agree with the Three Outlooks, because he doesn’t understand you at all.

Tell him that the sea is so beautiful, and he commented that you didn’t know how many people have drowned here;

You plan to spend $90 to watch a play, and he says the money is enough to watch 10 movies.

Something that seems logical to you, in his eyes, appears unthinkable.

It is difficult for you to change his perception, and he will not understand your thoughts. You will never be on the same frequency, and it is naturally tiring to get along with each other.

Especially when it comes to spending money, where conflicts of the Three Outlooks breaks out most often.

[Here the author shared an anecdote of how a couple fought over their holiday decisions]

This is common in life. From the coffee worth a few dollars, to the car worth tens of thousands, lots of marriage spirals into big arguments from the difference in spendings.

In the noise (of disagreements over which tour package to take for vacation), we forgot our original intention.

In fact, our original intention may be very aligned. It may be looking for a place to relax under the pressure of life and work, or looking for a place to have a romantic trip as a couple...

But when intention ran into a disagreement in regards to the Three Outlooks, the curtain fell in tragedy.

As time passed, no one remembered the original intention of the holiday vacation, or even the original intention of marriage!

Although they are all small things, they become exhausted in the eyes of people who do not agree with the three views, and become comfortable in the eyes of people with the same three views.

Hence, find someone with agreeable Outlooks as yours.

He may to play games, but also supports you in reading books;

He may like to stay at home, but yet willing to listen to you sharing interesting stories of your travel;

He likes to make skewers and go to food stalls, but he can also accompany you into western restaurants.

It is said that love comes second: not getting tired (of each other) even after a long time is foremost.

A lifetime is really long. Money and appearance may only determine whether you can be together, but the Three Outlooks determine whether you are suitable to go on.

The cores of the Three Outlooks are understanding, tolerance and communication, and these are what most marriages lack now. We all want to dominate or even control each other, but we often forget that everyone is an independent individual. The more we control, the farther the other party is from us; the quarreling, mutual satire, cold war and other issues will intensify and eventually lead to emotional breakdown.

If you have the same outlook on life, you will not turn your home into a battlefield because of different lifestyles;

If the concept of money is the same, there will be no conflicts due to money issues;

If you have the same values ​​in life, you won’t have nothing to talk about from not having a common language;

If the educational concept is the same, there will be no disagreements on child education, causing parents and children to be unhappy!

If you are not married yet, please find someone who is as close as possible to your Three Outlooks;

If you are already married, but the other party does not agree with your Outlooks, please strive to communicate, understand and tolerate, participate in learning together, grow together, in order for both your Outlooks to grow ever closer.

The best marriage is one that has a common direction and from there working hard to grow together, so as to make feelings more harmonious, and life better.

Source: https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/34081489

Current interest:

  • Personal finance, insurance and estate planning.
  • Time management, GTD, journaling
  • Worldbuilding (fantasy and sci-fi)
  • Crusader Kings 3, Wild Rifts, Legends of Runeterra

I write on: – Legacy planning and personal financeMy personal writings

Text me up on Telegram

I'm also on: Instagram LinkedIn