nicotiana

observations on pipe tobacco smoking

From my review of Savinelli Jupiter:

Summary: a middle of the road Burley-Virginia flake with a rum-molasses topping designed to give it a twist.

Those who like C&D flakes will recognize the loose broken flake immediately as well as the dry Burley used, but here it has been top-flavored with rum and sugars that give it a molasses-ish flavor. Personally, I prefer the fully-pressed flakes, since they achieve a better burn, but these thick slabs of mostly dark Burley do the trick. As the rum melts off and the sugars caramelize, the red and brown Virginia flavor manifests itself; I would have preferred more of this and dark fired Kentucky Burley, and less of the topping, which seems to be a substitute for the “right” level of Virginias. In my view, the rum-Burley interplay here does not quite work. It ends up tasting like an aromatic. These are not bad, and have enough strength to be an all-day blend, but they are not “there” yet either.

Apparently Jupiter and Janus were both C&D collaborations, but Juno was made by Mac Baren. Not surprisingly, I like the Mac Baren style “real” flakes better because they bring out the sweetness in the Virginias without being cloying. These are dry flakes with a not-particularly-interesting mixture of Burleys, a small amount of dark fired Kentucky Burley, and red and brown Virginias.

I would prefer more dark fired and Virginias to the bulky, dry, and dusty-tasting Burley used in these flakes, and less of the topping which tried to conceal how uninspired this blend is. It reminds me of Warhorse in that you basically taste a heap of C&D Burley with their “young” (unaged) Virginias on top and a distracting topping, thinking the whole time you are smoking it how a European-style press would involve more Virginia and greater pressure, producing a nice solid slow-burning flake with lots of flavor.

On this one, I feel like the rum/molasses topping gets in the way of the taste of the leaf and that is by design, since this flake would be fairly mundane otherwise. It's not bad, but it's not great, and for the price, you can get great flakes from GH, Mac Baren, McConnell, Rattrays, or Peterson so... why bother?

I pretty much love just about anything with dark fired Kentucky Burley in it, but this blend uses it exceptionally well, which is why Mac Baren – Stockton deserves a place in regular rotations across the globe:

Summary: a curly cut of mixed Virginias and dark fired Kentucky Burley that benefits from mediating Kentucky Cavendish

To avoid the “Mac Baren bite,” which is caused by their maple sugar flavorings burning hot when the bowl is lighted, you pile up some curly cut curlicues in a stack, then press them into the bowl; my big pipe takes seven in two layers, three on top and four on bottom. Then apply the flame, drawing into the stem of the pipe with short puffs, but not bringing the hot, steamy smoke into your mouth. Do this for a half minute until the maple sugar melts and becomes less incendiary, and you will enjoy the rich taste of a blend which like “HH Bold Kentucky” marries dark fired Kentucky Burley to a blend of bright and brown Virginias, producing a rich flavor with a sweet core.

In “Stockton,” however, a unique Mac Baren Cavendish made from more dark fired Kentucky Burley produces a counterpart to the brown Virginia flavor, thickening it and making more of a smooth transition from the Virginia sweetness to austere, formal flavor of the dark fired leaf (Mac Baren excels in such gradients, starting with their famous “Mixture”). The result, if I am honest, tastes like a Tootsie Pop or an Oreo cookie: a rich and dark bold roasted outer flavor with sweetness to follow, meaning that you get a blend which like the best of them avoids beating you over the head with its food flavors, keeping instead the tobacco at the forefront, and resembling some of the UK or German blends that use dark fired Kentucky Burley to give shape to what would otherwise be aimless Virginia sweetness. I hope this becomes a regular on the US market.

Like most Mac Baren blends, this one demands to be smoked slowly, but if you do so it provides a steady flavor that is not too sweet, but not too formal either, and therefore can be enjoyed for many hours or days at a time.

I see that as usual, C&D Cube Cut Burley remains inaccessible behind OUT OF STOCK banners at all the mail order sites. While C&D is not to everyone's taste, I think they do natural tobaccos well, but like bulk Virginia blends such as Sutliff Virginia Slices 507-C and Newminster No. 400 Superior Navy Flake, their Virginia blends need six months or a year to age before consumption. Cube Cut Burley is one of those blends that they were born to excel at making. You pour it into the pipe, light it, and wander off to enjoy a sweet and warm Burley flavor, like cracked roasted grain. I keep the stuff in a plastic pitcher when I can get it, and use the little spout to fill my pipes. It's dry, perfect for transporting, and works in just about any situation.

Since it is also nowhere to be found, I have sought alternatives, and found one of the worst tobaccos in my experience. Sutliff TS4 White Cube Burley starts with good leaf, but then they add sugar and way too much vanilla-cacao flavoring, so you get little corklike cubes that blaze up too hot, taste barely like tobacco, and expand to clog your pipe. I took this one on a field trip this weekend and eventually learned to pack the pipe halfway, then shake it so that the cubes were piled up against one side all the way to the top; when you light it then, they expand and fill.

Like many aromatic blends, it requires a hot start — puff hard but don't draw the smoke into your mouth — before letting the pipe cool off and relighting, at which point you get more tobacco flavor. It's terrible because it is botched; with just the vanilla and a tiny bit of cacao, this would be a good smoke like SWR or Lane Ready-Rubbed. Instead, it burns like the worst of the aromatics and obscures its own flavor.

And yet, smoking this terrible blend was not a terrible experience. I simply enjoy smoking and with the knowledge we now have of tobacco, even a mediocre blend is made well enough that it can be enjoyed to a degree. I walked the fields and fences breath-smoking this one disinterestedly, and that turns out to be the right cadence. I would not recommend it, but I was able to enjoy it, at least in that setting.

The best gardener I ever knew — an old guy, of course, since the ones with their wits about them survive while the others get eaten by wild boars, or something — told me his six-gun theory of gardening.

“You've got six bullets in the gun. Each one represents an hour of good labor, really actually being present and thinking about it time, that you have in a day. When you look at a garden, you have to decide where those go.”

He elaborated by pointing at a row of flowers and bushes. The bushes take time to plant, need babying, and will die if you do not properly dig, flatten the sides, gently deform the root ball, fill to the right pressure (like packing with shag) and water them in. The flowers? Dig a hole, drop, and pour water on them. Some weeds you can yank and toss, others you have to dig out.

“I've got two bullets to do those bushes. Another to get that small stump out of there, some kind of yucca. It'll take only one to do the flowers. You have to know when to do a perfectionist job, and when to plant like a college student. If you don't, you won't get it done, and you'll end up rushing the whole thing and have dead plants.”

The guy should be a CEO, but he'd never put up with an office, the meetings that should have been an email, the TPS reports, HR “concerns,” water cooler snipe-bullying, and office politics that belong in elementary school (“lower school” for y'all in the South). I took his wisdom to heart in all areas of my life, which explains my tobacco cellar.

My biggest efforts go toward people. I tend to like them, even if some are as cracked and flawed as I am, and realize unlike most of our species that people take time and effort. They are living things, like plants, so you have to make sure they have what they need, and to take time to wander around and move aside lower branches, looking for root rot and dryness or that errant stone which can make a plant crick and bend. Everything else in my life is chaos.

So now we turn to the tobacco “cellar,” although it barely qualifies for that name. When I wander into the local pipe shack, I buy things that look good. Sometimes I do this impulsively, when I'm thinking over a problem or just got through a tough experience, so the little tins come marching home in droves. When there are sales, online or in store, I tend to gravitate toward old favorites and bring home a box or two. All of these go into the cellar. Bulk blends go into jars, which I keep meaning to label, and tins go wherever they fit.

The cellar represents an archaeology of how things were going. That good year when money kept appearing in old jacket pockets? I picked up quite a few pounds of Gawith Hoggarth, Mac Baren, Sutliff, and Newminster bulk blends, and packed them away in jars at battalion strength. The grim years when the world seemed to be more on fire than usual produced jars of packet blends — the packets do not really keep their seal, so I jar them if I'm not going to smoke them immediately — and a few tins that I hope they bury with me so no one smokes them, stuff I bought on sale that has since been discontinued for just cause.

As far as organization goes, I fell back on my longtime friend's advice. An excellent worker knows when to be a UCLA med student level perfectionist and when to be a slacker. This closet, attached to our guest room that also serves as an office, exercise room, storage space, and temporary greenhouse, contains lots of stuff. It's quite large, for reasons unknown, since the bedroom is not huge. Books line most of the shelves, and random Walmart and Ikea shelving units are stuffed in there, too, overflowing with old technology, gifts from grandmothers long departed, pens and inks, art projects that seemed fun until the first big hurdle, big puffy coats for winters that materialize once a decade, fishing rigs and tackle boxes, a single ski, and random pieces that fell off the house or our refrigerator. It's the miscellaneous drawer writ large, but it also contains lots of little jars and tins, with a few of those decorative tins in the back that may contain treasure but are equally likely to be filled with old socks.

In my experience, the best jars have no label. Most have something scrawled on the top, usually initials that I thought would tell me something about the contents. However, the really good stuff — usually home blends — never gets a label because at the time I was thinking, “this is so awesome I'll never forget what it is.” Then the kitchen disposal blew up or the internet went out and I slid it onto a shelf, shut off the light, closed the door, and forgot about it for some arbitrary length of time. This is the only way that I “age” blends consciously, by seizing them like squirrels grab nuts and then stashing them away, to be discovered when I really need them.

Last night was a grim time because as usual I found myself in the sad place of staring at the shiny metal bottom of a tin, having depleted the contents. One is tempted to despair in such times, but the answer is to close the tin, toss it in the recycle bin (even though our city just drops that in the landfill), and go rooting and rummaging in the cellar for something good. If a jar looks promising, usually it is good, but sometimes amazing.

Having smoked from today's jar for a few hours, I can tell that it is an old batch of my favorite home mixture (as opposed to home blend, something made from relatively raw ingredients). I like to chop up Cotton Boll Twist and Brown Twist Sliced, dice some Long Cut Perique, toss in a little bright Virginia and Cigar Leaf, and then mix it up with my greedy fingers before jarring. It makes a really tasty vaper with some strength to it, and serves as the perfect blend for the first half of a week, which is why this jar came to me now. The closet knows, and the closet bestows. It shows the ultimate duality of “smoke what you like, and like what you smoke,” which is that the second part is as important as the first. You have to embrace what life sends your way and enjoy the heck out of it because today is unique like every other day, and both out of our control and there for us to feast upon.

When you look out there at hand-rolled cigarette-land, the Dutch blends dominate, not just with Drum — a perpetual favorite — but now with Peter Stokkebye Amsterdam Shag replacing the previous PS83 Amsterdam ribbon-cut pipe blend. However, these blends never seemed to catch on with pipe smokers the way, say, Semois or Tambolaka did.

Comprised of dark fired Kentucky Burley, red Virginias, and a light floral topping, these blends offer what pipe smokers in theory would desire: a complex texture of flavor based on the interplay between radical opposites which eventually fuse, with the help of the floral topping, into a naturally sweet and fruity flavor, sort of like cherry or fig.

My guess is that the deluge of vapers drove these blends out of existence since those reach a similar level of flavor. Add some dark fired Kentucky to a vaper, and you have basically everything the Dutch offer, even if you took a more complicated path to get there. Those more elaborate blends however offer more of a tangible sense of shifting flavor, and they all have cool backstories about how Mark Twain smoked them on the Titanic shortly before a Kraken took him away to Babylon to learn the secrets of the dark arts.

In my view, these simple blends deserve more attention. These are the archetypal walking-around smoke, flavorful in every breath but gaining intensity over time as the Virginias caramelize, both easily enjoyed and providing endless depth. Perfect for lunting, they burn well but slowly, thanks to the dark fired Kentucky Burley, and yet have plenty of natural tobacco taste at medium strength.

Their dual major ingredients also allow Dutch blends to be both sweet and avoid becoming too sweet, keeping a gentle fruity taste in the background that directs the natural flavor rather than replacing it. While this does not give you fodder for an Instagram post listing how the gentle flavors of humus and creosote are followed by notes of pecan cobbler, arsenic, brewer's yeast, and kumquat-mango IPA, they provide a nice solid smoke with most of the benefits of more complex blends.

Rattray's Marlin Flake presents a blend in the vein of Old Gowrie and Hal O' The Wynd but substitutes Cavendish for dark fired Kentucky Burley, which as one might expect allows the Virginia flavors to predominate with a soft underbelly of an almost nougat-like flavor from the interplay between Cavendish and small amounts of Perique.

Of course, my thought is that perhaps leaving in the dark fired Kentucky Burley and adding the Cavendish might result in an interesting blend, more like Erinmore Flake which combines strength and the lush layers of Cavendish and Virginia for a sweet, spicy, and dark honey rich all-day smoke. Where Erinmore Flake and Hal O' The Wynd would be desert island smokes for me, Marlin Flake misses this by a notch, in part because it is less of a rich dark honey flavor and more of a front sweetness.

Luckily we can find out why, as one reviewer suggested, by looking it up in the German national tobacco ingredients database, which tells us that for 1g of this tobacco, it includes:

That means that for every gram of this tobacco, a fifth of it consists of sugars, propylene glycol, and flavorings, including something unknown because it falls within the food-safe category. My guess is that this may be on the high side for specialty pipe tobaccos but well within the norms of regular OTCs and daily smokes.

In the end, it does not matter; the Virginia flavor comes through, the Cavendish thickens and smooths the smoke, and the Perique mostly appears in the latter half of the bowl as a figgy and fruity taste which brings out the natural flavors of the Virginia.

Tin note bears out this discovery. Upon opening the jar — I bought this in bulk from the local tobacco shack a year or two ago — one encounters the dense smell of dried fig or raisin, something I attribute to the fermenting of sugars. First light puffs away a marshmallow which I associate with propylene glycol and/or sugar additives, and then the Virginia taste emerges with the Cavendish lingering not far behind.

That forces me into my “Virginia pace” of a slow smoke, about one exchange every ten seconds or longer, since the thin smoke increases in flavor as it accumulates and ages slowly, unlike straight Burley which gets ashy slightly faster. This enables Marlin Flake to be a smooth, steady smoke with a great deal of flavor. I did not have trouble lighting or smoking this blend, and since I consider it pointless to rub out flakes or dry tobacco, I did neither.

The very light Perique presence makes me suspect that some of that flavoring that is not “Licorice Comet Blok” has a plum or amaretto overtone, since adding such things amplifies the Perique effect and enables the blender to use less of it. In my view, all blenders want to cheat toward using bright Virginia, white Burley, and Cavendish whenever possible, since these are cheaper than some of the other varietals they could employ.

While we tend to think of Rattray's as making high-end blends, Marlin Flake fits more appropriately for me into the category of everyday smoking, since it is designed to burn long and slowly with basically a sweet flavor like plum jam in a ginger cookie. You can load a bowl of this, stick the pipe in your mouth, and walk around tasting a gentle pleasant flavor for several hours, since the flake burns slowly if you avoid rubbing it out. At the end, I get ash with maybe a couple of “tail ends” of some flake shreds — it comes in big eight-inch skeins several inches wide, so you tear off strips and circle them up to stuff in the pipe — but otherwise skiing-quality fine grey powder.

Although I enjoy this blend, I have to rank Old Gowrie and Hal O' The Wynd slightly higher for more complexity of flavor. This reflects my subjective preference for harvest flavors (hay, grain, honey) over sweet winter flavors (berries, preserves, wine) and will probably not be widely shared. Where Old Gowrie subs in Virginias for some of the dark fired Kentucky Burley in Hal O' The Wynd, Marlin Flake replaces all of it and then adds sugar, and I think that works for an OTC — it's sweet like Sir Walter Raleigh — but reduces the dimension of flavor just a bit too much for regular smoking. Nonetheless, this is fine leaf that I was glad to try and will return to. Smoke what you like, and like what you smoke.

I wrapped up a good amount of Brown Twist Sliced in a flake of HH Bold Kentucky and stuck it in a Savinelli Quercia. So far, this is quite delicious, with the strong rich roast of the dark fired Kentucky balancing out the Virginias, but I noticed about a half hour ago that the ceiling has vanished and been replaced with a wireframe drawing of the wormholes in the universe. My hands have become translucent and I can see hieroglyphics revealing the secrets of the Book of the Dead. I've paired this with a “Dunkin Donuts” bold roast, and am digging deeper into serial killer lore (Sexual Homicide Patterns and Motives).

We live in a time of unprecedented access to mail order, which means an ability to acquire many blends from near and far with the click of a mouse. This results, as most new possibilities do, in an absurdly over-confident trend in which people figure that whatever is new must replace the old.

Being a caveman, literally an unreconstructed Cro-Magnon who would be happy wandering the darkest forests of Europe and Asia with an axe or spear, I have a simpler question: which blends are actually good? It seems to me that there are relatively few blend-types and every manufacturer produces its own versions of each, which means that you can spend your life tracking down every exotic variety without really experiencing much difference.

In my assessment, despite us having access to many blends from around the world, most people who smoke — this is different from the internet audience, which is both about a quarter of the population and only about eight percent of those who are online a lot — simply want to be able to get up, head out the door, and on their way to the fishing hole, barn raising, rocket launch, or post office pick up a packet of something tasty at their local grocery, pharmacy, or convenience store, then stuff it into some pipe they acquired for a low cost from a local store, and enjoy a normal smoke while they do other things.

I see a parallel here to nerds and normals. Nerds like to use computers, and so they invent reasons to do things with those computers; they always have lots of “projects,” almost none of which manifest as anything of any use. Normals use computers to achieve other tasks, since for them the computer is a tool useful because of the things it does that make their lives better. Internet pipe smoking “culture” fetishizes the rare pipes and tobaccos (like the kopi luwak Virginia flakes) because this draws attention to the pipe nerd. Since most people who use the internet a lot are there because their real lives are not satisfying, and so they run to the symbolic — read: “fake” — reality of cyberspace, the attention of an anonymous group makes them feel better about their lives. It's why behavior that would get you punched out and dropped in a sewer outlet pond in real life is commonplace on the internet, like passive aggression, attention-getting, bullying, and drama prostitution.

The internet seems often to dislike OTCs because they are common and therefore, get zero clicks, but the rest of us have no problem with them; we simply want higher quality OTCs. In my view, in the same way that “store brands” (generics) have gotten a lot better in the last decade, there is room for OTCs to improve, because a lot more people are working from home and smoking while they do it (nine out of ten scientists suggest that this is the best way to avoid murdering your co-workers; it has worked for me with only a few exceptions at our Calder Road office). Today's tobacco shows the work of one of the oldest and most deservedly highly-praised blending houses attempting an English take on an American-style OTC, combining Half and Half and Prince Albert into a gentle but satisfying aromatic.

Gawith Hoggarth Burley and Bright consists of, as the name implies, a mixture of white and dark Burley with bright Virginias. These blends, once called “half and half” in the vernacular, have a long history in the Americas, where smokers wanted the sweetness of Virginias without the cloying sugar overdose that led to singed tongues, and the stability of Burleys without the bland flavor. In this way, the two ingredients balance each other, and smart blenders probably made them closer to 60-40 in favor of the Burleys, since if you use a little more white Burley the flavor melds straight into the lemony toasted white bread flavor of the bright Virginia (for a great bright Virginia, try Gawith Hoggarth Kendal Gold). A straight ribbon cut in the slighter thinner style favored by the old Dunhill blends for easier burning, Burley and Bright features a lot of Virginia flavor framed in the warm Burley and topped with cocoa and cherry. While any blend with sugar, whether natural from the Virginias or added as seems to be the case here, can singe the tongue with steam, Burley and Bright minimizes that effect for a gentle smoke, mild in nicotine, which can be enjoyed just about anywhere and will leave the room smelling reasonably pleasant.

Therein comes a paradox. This blend would be great and a common smoke for me, if I could wander on down to my local Kroger and pick up a packet, but instead, it is a special order from abroad, and more is the pity for that. For me, Burley and Bright exemplifies the enduring appeal of the OTC, which is meant to be enjoyed while doing other things and does not try to steal the spotlight for itself. Pack a bowl of this, and wander around smoking while you mow the lawn, fix the leaky sink, worm the dog, or configure your load-balanced network storage devices, and you will enjoy not an attention-getter but a quiet complement to your life, much like these gentle flavors harmonize with the natural flavor of these tobaccos in this blend.

A flavorful but gentle light English blend, Gawith Hoggarth #25 Mixture provides the archetypal Virginia-based smoke of Presbyterian and Early Morning Pipe:

Summary: this light English blends uses the sweet Virginias to make the Latakia stand out for a spicy, herbal smoke.

For those who love “Early Morning Pipe” and “Presbyterian,” another light English comes along which might serve as a decent substitute. Gawith Hoggarth does Virginias better than anyone else on Earth, and in this blend, the mixture of sweet bright Virginias and rich brown Virginias produces the bulk of the flavor, framing the Latakia and allowing it to zoom to the forefront. Consequently, you taste the Latakia swimming in a sea of sweetness, producing the sweet-and-sour tang for which English blends are famous. In my view, you taste more of the Latakia and get more depth of flavor this way. Essentially however this remains a Virginia blend, tamed to cool smoking by the other ingredients and perfect for smoking over the course of a day.

Especially for those fans of the Dunhill/Peterson blend, this one provides a good step halfway between that and Presbyterian, since while it is low in Latakia, the flavor remains prominent enough to be enjoyed.

Some time ago, I felt it necessary to expand my knowledge of the process of making tobacco blends and with that in mind, to make an aromatic tobacco. This was probably a “hold my beer” moment, but apparently it lasted for a few days at least.

According to my blending/tasting journal, which consists of misspelled emails riddled with typos sent to myself in the early hours of the morning, this one was a mixture of white Burley, dark Burley, and a touch of red Virginia with a pinch of Orientals.

To this I added a mixture of distilled water, honey, lemon juice, vinegar, a dash of Everclear, and a pinch of salt. I sprayed this over the tobacco with one of those little plastic hand sprayers, which I remember being the most irritating part of the process, tossed it on an oven parchment, let it dry awhile, and then pitched it into jars.

Were these jars labeled? No. However, in an attempt to identify them as homemade aromatics, I drew pentagrams on them with some kind of crayon thing made for writing on windows (it has since disappeared into the kitchen drawer labeled “miscellaneous” where just about everything is but nothing can be found).

Taking it out of the jar, I find it to be about as damp as your average Gawith Hoggarth blend, which seems terrible since the first light gives off a huge cloud of smoke with steam as if a very tiny nuclear bomb has detonated inside the bowl. However, as soon as the blend heats up, this extra moisture seems to help the sugars outside and in caramelize.

Throughout the bowl it has a nice honey flavor, very gentle but also strongly present in the background, into which the almond-like Burley and scone-like Virginia flavors waft and intermingle. The Orientals may be presence as a faint sourness balancing the sweet, but are hard to pick up on consistently.

At just one freeway exit past “medium” on the strength scale, and of mild flavor, this blend could be an all-day smoke for those who do not mind the somewhat two-dimensional flavor. If I had to do this again, I might do more lemon juice and less vinegar, with slightly less water, and just a tad more alcohol.

In any case, life loves its ceremony of opposites. While I am not opposed to aromatics, and like some of them very much, I detest most aromatics, especially those of the 1-Q, Autumn Evening, Sun Bear, and Luxury Navy Flake persuasion. This one slides past my filters and has been thoroughly enjoyed, but it may simply be pride. -