Asexualism is a myth.
Asexualism is a myth.
Of course my favorite things are more than just the two. But I’m not gonna list the whole anatomy here.
I never called people masculine or feminine because I don't need to know how someone performs their gender to hate them. Being rude or being stupid are not gender-specific. I also felt like I didn't understand those two words.
But lately, I found a new use for them. So like, when I like someone, then and only then the gender will matter, right? Because I only like boy, and not the other gender. I would like to express that the attributes I like only exist in a boy. The boy. Not any boy. It couldn't be personality traits. Because no matter how much I like their personality, those are not gender-specific traits.
But like, I find their facial hair or their height masculine to me. I don't have facial hair myself, nor do I want it, nor do I like that in somebody else. I also don't want other people to steal my definition of what I find masculine. Or make it a universal trait and apply to every loser. This is my own way of seeing how biological difference matters. And it only applied to one person. Because again, hating doesn't require gender. Only being sexually attracted to someone does. So I would use the word 'masculine” similar to how I use the word “attractive” but with the emphasis on physical attributes that I don’t have exclusively.
Maybe there are better words for it. Ones that don't make me want to throw up when everyone else uses it because I know they imply something I hate. But for now, I can't come up with other words.
So Western trad men say masculinity is accepting your innate aggression, and Asian trad men say masculinity is giving parents your monthly salary. I don't know which one is correct.
And funny they mentioned that girls can just be naturally harmonic when dealing with conflicts. Because when I was 15, my biggest demon wasn’t math, but that I had to control myself not to use violence.
The typical girls, then, believe that it is actual science, proceed to hide their aggression by pretending they are totally lovely (reaction information). The passive aggression and hidden sadism, then, replace the obvious violence, further confirms the gender aggression theory. But now they add another “fact” to complete the theory, that “girls are manipulative”.
By their logic, gifted schools would be full of low-testosterone boys running around the campus because they never fight. No. In that environment, both girls and boys know reputation matters. To have an academic future and white collar jobs, they can't act on their aggression, even if they are boys. Instead, boys would just be as passive-aggressive like every other girls because it's more convenient.
They all seem to agree to have the same definition of masculinity. They kind of just agree with each other in private, but none of them tells the audience what it means. Kind of ironic, because they would jump over the chair if someone say that they can feel their gender. But here they think masculinity is tangible as well. I gave up and listen to some music to clean my ears instead.
I'm listening to three trads boy talking about masculinity and how society is feminizing everything (still don't know what that word means) so I can have materials for my writing (cursing) later. It's only 3 minutes in and I can't even organize my thoughts.
Hello tutor.
In case you don't know, I can only see your last 20 followings. So I was working with very limited information here.
The book was from the coffee shop. And I didn't even drink coffee. I drank apple cinnamon tea. I'm so sleepy. But now I know that I made my coffee wrong.