viewMany people shamed Ben into submission to monogamy. But that's not really an elegant way to go about it. If moralization worked, people wouldn't cheat or exploit at all. A while ago, I heard an interviewee on BBC, “No, we definitely don't torture the hostages we already kidnapped because our religion teaches us to always be kind.”!
I don't think Ben is simply evil. So unlike people who try to decode what they call “entitlement”, I assume what Ben wants is genuine. I assume that Ben wants a loving, committed relationship. I assume that Ben also wants sex outside of that relationship. I assume this set up it is who he is, like how someone be gay by being born that way as he declared. So in general, I take his words exactly for what they are. My question then becomes: Why does Ben play fast and lose with his sexual orientation?
Let's go back to the classic example of a girl who has libido towards a handsome boy, but society tells her that acting enthusiastic to boy is degrading.
Ambivalence relation: I like to express my desire openly. But most people don’t like it or can’t do it. I choose to do it this way because I like being clear with my intention. When I face rejection from the boy, I take it as differences in preferences. I then pick people with the same preferences.
Narcissistic relation:
- Option 1: being sex-positive is progressive. People who are not are bigots. And if the boy rejects me, he's a bigot too.
- Option 2: I deny my preference, I listen to my parents and my peers. And girls who do express their enthusiasm are, indeed, degrading.
Borderline relation: I don't know which one is right. And I don't want my preference to cause any friction to anyone that they would leave. The status of the relationship is more important than understanding myself. Therefore, I don't have preference. When I meet someone more open, I would be open too. When I'm with someone timid, I would be shy too.
So what does any of this have anything to do with Ben?
Since identity is what you do, but also how you react to other people's judgment and validation.
In relationship of someone ambivalence, differences are characteristics of different people. There are what you are comfortable with and what you are not. They don't destabilize your identity.
In relationship of someone narcissistic, differences threaten the superiority of their own choices. But it's not just differences. Even if the narcissistic person claim to love the partner, soon, dependency will also threaten superiority too. Therefore, devaluation of the partner is inevitable.
In relationship of someone borderline, differences is not a thing. Because the person always adapts. Without a close relationship, you feel hollow because you don't have any likes or dislikes of your own. But, to be too close, you absorb an entire personality and that’s destabilizing. Because, soon, it will contradict your history and your other versions of adaptation. So what you need is a system where you can have something stable enough to mimic preferences, but still have an option to detach from it. And that’s where Ben is.