Apparently, many tech bros think it was an emotional piece of literature, and many girls want men to write for them like this. Yes, every girl wants someone to praise them as “luminescent” for 1342 words without a single personality trait being discussed. It’s very hard to do that since most people have their own criteria and judgment.
Mama boys are at the bottom of the dating pool in Asia, but apparently, many Western boys don’t know that. They bragged about their moms all the time on dating sites. A very common plot in K-drama is the born rich boy gives up his status and inheritance and fights against his parents (the mom will always wear fur) for the girl. Now, if the boy is supposed to be a “nhu nhược” character, he does the opposite and everyone spits on him.
I didn't idealize them at 5 either.
Dude said “trust as much as my mother” as he used his mom as the benchmark is a way to say “I still idealize my parents like I’m a 10 years old”.
So the weirdo who refuses to die actually has a girlfriend. And he spent 7994 characters to describe her by describing himself. And everyone applauded that was peak romance. Something is seriously wrong with this tech culture.
We've already discussed about it (me and GPT). Your model is way superior. Not that I need you to be superior in every way. Because I'm not a narcissist, despite the rumor. And also, it's not possible. But you are superior in what I highly value.
I've seen several autistic boys who can do things with maximum freedom. It definitely has something to do with their autism. What they do is to blur their roles and others in a contract/ community/ structure. The upside is right away.
For example, you give someone a template of how to communicate with other people. Instead of calling them a customer service person and paying an hourly rate according to their skill. You call them an ambassador. Their role is now blurry. They can even bring more leads to you. So you don't just have a customer service person. But also extra features that you never put in an agreement and are situational. Since it wasn't in a formal agreement, you think you are free, and with zero dependency.
We often only see the drawbacks years later. When you compound the drama caused by resentment and entitlement and confusion. You actually increase your dependency a lot more, not less. In the example above, the founder can't discipline the ambassador. Because the ambassador is not his employee. Instead of just training customer service communication tasks, and having someone else as PR person. The founder blurs the role for his maximum temporary benefit. But now, the ambassador also knows more about the structure of the organization, which makes it easier for the ambassador to imitate the model itself or cause reputation damage.
So the founder, and people like him, think that they get rid of dependency by never giving other people a clear expectation of a formal agreement. But it's actually the opposite. You reduce dependency by making sure everyone knows what they should expect from you.
My sister is careless on things that shouldn’t be and too concerned for nonsensical social fluff. I’m very tired of that.
See you again soon Marten.
Accidentally revealed the secret to the lady who sold me the ceramic bowls next to the barbershop, that, cutting my hair there was cheaper. She was asking why I didn't go to proper places for ladies. I don't want her to pass the information to her neighbor, or to go there herself. This can only work for me, because I have great hair and styling.
Hello handsome boy.