For every splitter who wants to fix their zero libido everytime they devalue their spouse by involve as many people as superficial as possible (since one can't devalue someone one never values in the first place!). There is an obsessive who thinks it's a great idea and a MORAL DUTY to be inclusive, and accommodate, even celebrate every lifestyle! It sounds very logical on gender philosophy textbook anyway!
Oh I don't know anything about drink, but I can listen to the magic of how one makes it.
Since I'm such a multicultural person, I go to the Korean directly when I want to FEEL LIKE heartbroken with a desperate love never returned, but actually confident and content (because normally when I'm actually hopeless, I wouldn't want to push myself over the edge). There is a quality in the Korean culture that promotes getting to know someone deeply before doing anything rash. Not that I know if they actually do it in practice and I doubt that they do, but I would prefer listening to songs about that than Western songs about having regretful sex with someone who hasn't passed the security questions.
When I want to buy a pair of pants, I go directly to the Chinese. I can't wear tight clothes. It affects my daily jumping and climbing. And the Chinese produce their specific type of linen material just for me. Lithuanian linen is great, it gives the rustic look, but I'm not rustic. Vietnamese linen is totally different in processing, they use it to create high-end fashion and I'm not interested in that, at all. Japanese linen gives out modesty and simplicity, which I like to look at, but I feel like I'm not modest enough as a person. And seems like to be qualified to wear them, I need to be a vegan too! The Chinese gives me a comfortable form and retro look. It's more expensive than the European ones, and I still can't afford if I want to buy the Japanese.
Not that I don't also buy a lot of cheap junk. My favorite shirt is $1.15 and it's not even Chinese. I bought it in a sale day, and it doesn't have sleeves, or the bottom half. But I like the irregular shape and the bear printing.
Ignorant people think just need to limit competition of price and their business will bloom. But small businesses often can't afford to compete on cheapness anyway. Since after you pass a certain point of cheapness, it's actually more expensive to keep being cheap. Unique tailors build their brands on the understanding of materials and cater to a very specific type of people. They have to know limitations of each material and not just grab whatever material available to them.
I'm going to sleep now. See you later.
Don't know what's those boys with the kickball be shirtless for. They are not the one who's supposed to take the shirt off!
Just hate lazy people.
Actually I'm the most decorative in the family out of my own hobby and I actually hate dudes who spend too much time on looks. I don't have that much free time and so shouldn't they. My mom was made fun of by kids at school for wearing cheap clothes. And my dad still wears free T-shirts from my puzzle-solving prizes.
Few days ago there was a post about Chinese sellers taking place on e-commerce sites making native “entrepreneurs” having nowhere to go. And so the victimhood became explosive.
What they didn't say that, the majority of their “business model” in the early days of Amazon was FINDING a good product from an existing brand and slap it on the marketplace. Not that it's a bad or unethical model, clever even. You fulfill a certain demand that others don't. But they got confused and thought that they were the ones who made good products.
How is it important?
Since they don't make the products themselves. The finding and the marketing are very important. You can't sell a good product from a local brand. Because, if everyone already has access to it, then why would they buy from you? You need to find a very good product from other countries that most people don't know. And a lot of those products are good too. So your profit is justified.
That brings the question, now that the foreign brand knows that their products are in demand elsewhere, why don't they just sell them directly?
You see, just few years ago, shipping costs were crazy expensive, and it took months to arrive. And if it didn't arrive, then you had to bear the cost. Between expensive shipping and a high possibility for parcels to get lost, if you are not careful, you might end up on the opposite of having a profit.
So who are the people who can make the most of this situation?
Is it the foreign brand that makes good products that people from another country want to buy it so much? Is it the designer or the cosmetic chemists that take pride in their good work?
No. It's the “entrepreneurs” who live in the US so they can distribute the goods once they arrive to US with low shipping fee and fast delivery. And they have family tie or connection to the origin countries where the products were made, so they can have the products shipped in with cheaper cost than other “entrepreneurs” who don't have the connection.
So now, traveling is easier, logistics is faster and cheaper, why wouldn't those brands just sell their products directly for a better margin? And in fact, they do.
And since “entrepreneurs” never learn to make products themselves, they can't compete with people who can, when their advantage of location and logistics is no longer the case.
I ate a lot of good food today. See you tomorrow.
Crafted a message last night but forgot to hit the “publish” button.