burntends88

A husband, father and teacher. Film is my passion, and I believe learning is a lifelong journey. You can find me on Twitter @BurntEnds88

OK, I'll hold my hands up and admit I wasn't sure which direction to take my gratitude challenge posts when I first started. But it kind of grew organically to end with an article on my wife.

When you consider my previous posts, and account for this, the final one of the challenge, Family is what I would say links them together.

Your spouse is the foundation to which you build your family onto.

With all successful marriages, compromise and understanding are a necessity – to continue the analogy, they are the bricks and mortar of your home.

To read the concluding chapter of my entry into the #coilgratitudechallenge, sign up to Coil here for just $5 and you too can enjoy ad-free exclusive content.

Read more...

Cross pollination of systems and platforms is a terrific way to boost each other's fan bases.

Since starting Coil, I have contributed to Cinnamon, posted selfies on gFam and signed up to mg.social. Oh yeah, I've also got my xumm sorted too.

In the short space of two months I have looked to immerse myself into the web monetized world.

When starting out, my intention was to stay focused on the Coil blogging platform. But that changed soon after coming across friendly people all willing to offer a helping hand and welcome me into their global village.

The web monetized world is considered scary to non-subscribers – from my experience anyways. But that's only because it's unfamiliar territory. I stepped into it with trepidation, as I'm not technically proficient by any means.

Granted, there are areas of the various platforms I've signed up to where I could be doing more. But that will come with time.

So to that end, I would like to introduce you to a challenge. If you're not signed up to gFam, then I urge you to do so. Once on it, post a selfie (one entry per person) of you in your favourite superhero outfit – you can opt for a character from either the DC or Marvel world. Alternatively, create your own costume and give yourself a superhero name. In either case, tell me what your superhero name is, and post your story in the relevant section about what it is you like particularly about your chosen superhero identity.

**I will tip you an amount dependent on two factors:**

1 – The costume

2 – Your story

I will tip for anyone who chooses a DC character.

You're going to post a selfie on there anyway, it might as well be in costume!

Please click on their Welcome to gFam article about how to sign up to their platform if you're not registered.

The reason I do this is because I like what their platform represents. That is, to my mind, promote positivity through the simplicity of an image in what is seemingly an overcast world at the moment.

Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's gFam to the rescue!

So let's see your superhero identities come to life over on gFam!

To give you all a chance to get set up, this challenge will run from Wednesday 1st July to Friday 3rd July (BST). In the interest of fairness, only entries within the designated time frame will be accepted for the challenge tips. Then y'all can enjoy your 4th of July celebrations thereafter!

For those of you without a Coil login, you'll need a payment pointer to take part in the gFam challenge, as it's all web monetized. Simply click this Coil link and get started today for just $5 a month.

Though some of you have seen this, for inspiration, here's me when I was 6! For subscribers only, My story can be found here.

Here's my children sporting their costumes in case you need more convincing to take part!

Hardened by a personal tragedy and molded by expectations of an outdated era, Hopper serves Hawkins as the community's cynical Chief of Police.

Season 1 of Stranger Things is awash with memorable characters. But perhaps there's one in particular that took us all by surprise to become the gang's patriarch, and our very own television dad (or brother dependent on your age)!

S1:E1 (screen grab)

Hopper's introduction is laced with so much meaning. The four images are a continuous panning shot from a child's drawing to conclude with a sorry excuse of a slob lying on a couch.

Looking first at the drawing – the page provides our first clue about Hopper. He must have a child and a wife based on the figures. But the creased page suggests something drawn in the past.

As we pan across the room we notice a single plate with beer cans before a pile of strewn clothes and a cluttered mess. The mise-en-scene represents Hopper as a drunken slob, unreliable and undependable. It doesn't seem to match the initial picture postcard of a loving father and husband.

S1:E1 (screen grab)

To accentuate his isolation, he is separated by civilization – where is the family we see in the drawing? Our glimpse into Hopper's world sees him as a flawed and forgotten man, lacking ambition.

S1:E1 (screen grab)

We learn very quickly that Hopper is an authoritative figure of Hawkins. The two close up shots are cut together in sequence to depict iconography associated with power.

When considering each character and their gender, Hawkins is populated with men in hierarchical positions. Hopper, Mr. Melvald (store keeper), Mr. Clarke (teacher), Brenner – they are all superiors. They reflect a time period befitting of the eighties. This is of course the equilibrium, and as such, represent stereotypes in readiness of demonstrating arcs to eventually bring us up to speed to meet the sensibilities of our time today.

S1:E1 (screen grab)

Drinking coffee and eating doughnuts. Police are playing card games with their feet up on desks. This is not just about presenting a force that's lazy, but more about what Hawkins represents. A sleepy town where nothing exciting happens.

The Duffer Brothers are creating a world where its protagonists are the underdogs. And as an audience, we all love and root for them.

S1:E1 (screen grab)

“He's not like you, Hopper.” The reference is to suggest that Hopper is the epitome of masculinity, whereas Will isn't. More on Will in Chapter Four. Hopper's gruff exterior and position in society is at binary opposites to that of the missing child.

Binary opposites is a theory used to establish key ideologies by pitching characters at odds with each other. Stranger Things explores the concept of masculinity through Hopper in particular.

S1:E1 (screen grab)

To reinforce the stereotype, it is revealed that Hopper used to have a daughter, but she passed away. Here, we view Hopper from a distance in a long-shot as he wanders in darkness. He refuses to acknowledge his emotions and dismisses his past. The low-key lighting captures his inner turmoil. But there's good in Hopper, as accentuated by the fact he is walking towards a lightened area within the frame. It is to imply that he is in search of redemption.

For us to root for anyone we must first want to like them, or to have sympathy for them. By drawing us into Hopper's world with the child's picture and the reveal of a personal tragedy, we are now ready to invest our energy into his character for the rest of the season.

This enigma of a man is fast becoming a firm favourite with the audience, crafted with precision by connoisseurs of the long form television format.

As discussed in previous chapters of this anthology, the final episode is key to establishing our perception of a character's growth.

S1:E8 (screen grab)

The initial image pits Hopper in The Upside Down where he has a flashback to reveal his backstory. It's what we've all been waiting for!

The P.O.V from Hopper as he plays chase with his daughter firmly positions the audience in his shoes. He catches up to her and hoists her high up into the air – the light flares add a surreal feel to the scene while they play happily. The juxtaposition in lighting between Hopper's past and his present is a deliberate attempt by the show's creators to demonstrate difference in time and tone.

But then it begins to turn sour, as the camera winds like a corkscrew to reveal the final shot. The camera's movement, snakes around and tightens to a more claustrophobic frame, highlighting the impending doom. The distraught facial expressions and canted angles help to reveal panic and danger.

S1:E8 (screen grab)

Cutting back to the present, Hopper is afforded a close up. This lets us in closer to him – his torment becoming visible for all to see now.

The iconography of a terminally sick child lying in a hospital bed being read to by a parent is hard to watch – you can't help but sympathise with Hopper.

His final position in the sequence has us view him from a high-angle. He is hunched with his head in his hands – so vulnerable – expressing his emotion. He is a broken man, emasculated as he cannot do anything to save his own child – powerless and alone.

Representing men as emasculated is something that was, and is commonplace when exploring the 1970s time period. The tail-end of this era, on the cusp of a new eighties dawn, will have been when Hopper experiences the loss of his daughter.

Vietnam was a debacle and the treatment of its soldiers returning home was nothing short of a disgrace, leaving them with PTSD, and afforded little assistance. They were forgotten men of war. They were broken heroes.

Stranger Things, while set in 1983, taps into the seventies mindset to reflect in its characters their emotional turmoil.

S1:E8 (screen grab)

The urgency of saving Will, inter-cut with Hopper's final moments with his own child reflect an opportunity to save someone else's. This is where Hopper can begin the road to redemption.

The long-shot captures an out of focus Hopper consoling his wife. They are in effect distanced physically and metaphorically. The medium close up featuring his wife half out of frame suggests this is the beginning of the end of their relationship.

S1:E8 (screen grab)

It seems fitting then that Hopper is the adult left to supervise and act on Eleven's behalf as her 'adopted' parent. A chance for Hopper to find value in his life once more. The motif of the waffle is an indicator of her existence and the final close-up image leaves us on a cliffhanger - a typical convention of long form television dramas.

Chapter Four: The Boys on its way soon... until then, you can follow me on Twitter @BurntEnds88 and enjoy a little more content on Hopper below.

Chapter One: Nancy Wheeler

Chapter Two: Karen Wheeler & Joyce Byers

S1:E5 (screen grab)

As the season progresses so too do our characters. Hopper transforms from wearing his 'police costume' to something, which differentiates him from authority – to create an opposite with Hawkins Laboratory.

He wears brown tones and a plaid shirt – very 'normal'. He is one of 'us'. Hopper infiltrates the laboratory facility to get to the bottom of Will's disappearance.

S1:E5 (screen grab)

Soon after finding the gates to The Upside Down, Hopper is drugged by government officials and returned to his mobile home. He awakens confused and severely warned.

The second image is particularly important – the high-angle positions Hopper as insignificant and vulnerable to the threat posed by Brenner and his team.

S1:E5 (screen grab)

It's important to reflect on this moment where Hopper calls his ex-wife. We assume it to be her based on the previous clues revealed in episode 1.

The striking aspect of this scene is the way the camera tracks in slowly to a close up, and the score, which plays soft, somber notes. We are meant to feel sorry for Hopper. He is about to engage in battle with a higher power and he is finally looking to open himself up further.

What I find particularly revealing is the diegetic sounds of a crying baby on the other end of the call being hushed by the woman Hopper is talking to. We can only assume Hopper's wife then has moved on with her life, unlike Hopper at this point in time.

It is significant how Hopper has not been able to move on himself from the death of his daughter. In not doing so, brings us closer to Hopper, allowing us to connect with him emotionally, as we feel sympathy for him.

S1:E7 (screen grab)

Hopper's call to action now lets him and his police force take the initiative. Gone away is the stereotypical outlook of a disenfranchised unit and in its place is a positive representation of the community's law enforcement, as depicted through a powerful low-angle shot, to determine a change in their status with the audience.

Are you a content creator, but not getting paid for the time and effort of your work? Why don't you give Coil a try? It's an ad-free experience with lots of exclusive features. You can sign up to the platform for just $5 a month and start earning today

Header banner is of a photograph I took and the font, ICT Benguiat BT, is free for all to use.

Read more...

Made refugees in 1974, my parents lost their home and all their possessions.

1974 was also the year they were married. Just shy of four weeks later, they had to flee their home from the Turkish invasion of Cyprus. Some honeymoon! To this day they still haven't had a honeymoon.

My parents are Greek Cypriots. They were introduced – arranged in some way – and three weeks later they were celebrating their wedding day. I publish this post today because it is also their anniversary. 46 years strong.

Being immigrants isn't easy for anyone. It certainly wasn't for them. They have faced racist abuse with death threats and messages to go home (they kept this from us, as any parents would, for some time). But one particular memory I have that only scratches the surface of their negative experience is when I was a child. My parents, with four boys, were looking to upgrade their house to give us a little more space. We went for a viewing and liked the property. But my dad has a thick accent and spoke to my mum in Greek during the viewing. That didn't go down well with the home owner. When my parents wanted to put in an offer, the estate agent had to break the news to them that the home owner in no uncertain terms wanted to sell to a 'foreigner'.

I have suffered abuse and taunts as a child growing up – bullied in school. Ridiculed because of my name. Come to think of it, all my brothers were bullied at some point for the same reasons. I was born and raised in the UK. I consider myself British, but I staunchly defend my heritage because it helps to define who I am. If I don't, it sullies the efforts of my parents and their hardship.

Racism: Disgraceful. Disgusting. Deplorable.

My parents work hard – never once did they stand in a dole line for a handout. Becoming working citizens of the UK, they paid their taxes and never missed a payment on their mortgage.

My dad was a barber – retired now. Mum was a hairdresser – gave up the job to be a doting housewife and look after us boys. They lived to ensure we had a stronger footing in life than they did.

I played footy as a kid – love the game. I played for local football teams and it was my mum who took me to all the matches. My mum was basically a taxi service for the four of us. To wherever. Whenever. My mum would always step up. Mum's really are the driving force of a home. It's like in My Big Fat Greek Wedding, the man might be the head, but the woman is the neck, controlling the direction of where the head goes.

Incidentally, if you have seen My Big Fat Greek Wedding, then I can categorically tell you the stereotypes are real! I have a brother and so many cousins called 'Nick' – it's tradition to name your children after your parents. And as my dad is one of nine children, there's plenty of opportunities for this to unfold. I was named after my granddad on my mother's side.

Like I touched on earlier, my dad has a terrific old-school work ethic. Never took a day off sick either. Took the plunge eventually later on in his career to run his own barber shop. This was a huge deal for him – the risks were great – with a family to provide for. It worked out.

You could say this work ethic was also a hindrance, as it tends to give you a conservative outlook on life – not wanting to take financial risks early on. He had opportunities to purchase a second house in the late 1980s on more than one occasion. He chose not to remortgage, as he was the sole provider and if anything happened to him then we would be landed with the subsequent debt. We all know what happened to property prices – they went boom! He says he regrets not buying the house, but that's all in hindsight and wouldn't change the way things are now.

However, that's not the point here. This is about my dad ensuring we had a roof over our heads. Clothes on our backs. Food on the table. For reasons I imagine have to do with them both living in poverty as children, my parents can be forgiven for not wanting to chance on the prospect of positioning their own children in a similar situation.

My parents are traditional – if I was analytical here, I'd say they still live in 1974. It's as though time for them stopped that fateful day. They had to start from the very beginning in another country. They had visited the UK prior to the invasion so it seemed like the right place for them to find new roots.

I learn from my parents – how to do things. But, probably more importantly, how not to do them. There's always a lesson to learn from your elders. They make decisions that they believe best serve their children.

I'm proud of my parents. And, like in My Big Fat Greek Wedding, I too live next door to them!

#coilgratitudechallenge

_____________________

For $5 a month you could access exclusive content only for subscribers – blog and watch videos ad-free! Just click on this link to see all the amazing features available to you and get creating today!

Read more...

FORTIFIED

This edition of Movie Quotes is brought to you by 'A GONE IN 60 SECONDS PRODUCTION'

I thought I'd slightly alter proceedings by focusing on just one film with multiple quotes pulled from it.

https://www.cinnamon.video/watch?v=344624037957207946

Pop quiz hot shot! Yes, that's right, SPEED (de Bont, 1994). If you're a fan of either Keanu Reeves or Sandra Bullock then you'll absolutely love this – it's a blast from start to finish.

Supported by Dennis Hopper and Jeff Daniels, the film's strength is in its high-concept. It's difficult not to be swept up in the euphoria of the thrills and spills that transpire over its almost 2hr run time.

It contains one of the more ludicrous stunts that needs to be seen to be believed, but you won't care. You'll be cheering them on as they keep the bus from dipping below 50mph.

And to ensure you enjoy the ride all that more, you'll be taken in by Mark Mancina's rousing score, as the action builds and tension ramps up.

If you haven't seen it then find it! If you have seen it then tell me you don't want to watch it again now?!

**The header banner is my own.
**

For $5 a month you could access exclusive content only for subscribers and watch videos ad-free! Just click on this link to see all the amazing features available to you and get creating today!

While you're still here, check out my Cinnamon page and follow so you don't miss out on more videos,and watch more Gone in 60 Seconds productions with me and my children!

Movie Quotes #1

Movie Quotes #2

If you're a subscriber then you'll be able to access the Outtakes video of this edition of Movie Quotes! What more incentive do you need than that to sign up?!

Read more...

My experience of siblings has always meant it was about unity and togetherness. But now, as we age, I'm thinking it stands for tolerance.

I'm one of four brothers. And we do get on well. That's me on the left as you see it (I was kind of inspired by Ken Melendez and his post featuring a photograph of him with his brothers)

There'd be times where we'd fight and bicker. But mostly there were times where we'd play and laugh together.

Where we now have technology at our fingertips to keep us occupied, we instead relied on utilising physical objects and imagine a world where they came to life.

As there were four of us, we'd split into two teams – my older brother and me against my two younger brothers – they are twins after all so that made sense. We'd play football in the back garden and wreck the grass (my dad spent many hours tending to his grass). We knew we were gonna get it, but at the time, we didn't care. We had fun for a couple of hours and that was enough to make any telling off worthwhile.

Of course, scuffed up grass wasn't just it – my dad also liked his greenhouse. But on the odd occasion – more times than not, we'd break the glass with a stray kick of the ball. When it happened, we knew playtime was over so we hid in our rooms in anticipation for when my dad would come home.

But this isn't about my dad – we were a handful. Not quite the NickelNDime handful, but we had our moments!

We'd take a bucket of toy soldiers and share them out. Build barricades with odd items such as shoes, toys and any other smallish contraptions we could find. The rules were simple – you can hide your soldiers behind the items, but part of it must be visible to the opponents eye. From there we'd take it in turns to throw an eraser at each other's army. I loved this game.

Then there were the times where we'd get on each other's nerves – many things were thrown in anger. Hard things that would have made serious damage had any of us been able to throw straight. A 'double A' battery launched from 5 yards springs to immediate mind, which missed my head by an inch. But these times were few and far between.

Of course, there were also the board games. Boy were we competitive. Ever played Risk? Chances are you might be familiar with this story then. The game was decided on the roll of dice. You amass hordes on your land and begin the process of completing your mission by invading the neighbouring countries and their armies. All you have to do is roll higher than the opponent. Well, the blood boiled over so many times it almost ended up with fists flying, as well as the board being flung across the room. Game over. We all refuse to play Risk with each other now, such was the emotion involved and the negativity that came with it.

I guess the point is, I have fond memories of my brothers growing up for which I am thankful for. But, as we went our separate ways and met our better halves, so too did the sense of togetherness. I'm not for one second expecting we stand on each others feet, but we don't really talk half as much as I would like. Perhaps I need to take responsibility for that – I talk to Nick, my older brother more than I do the twins. The twins talk to each other more than they do us.

The twins do have names. But we always call out to them as twins. Funnily enough, if we were all out together and I called for Mario, I'd get no response. If I called out to Andreas, he too wouldn't respond to his name. But, if I call out 'Twins', they both turn in acknowledgement!

I guess it's like when we were younger and we'd split into two teams. We still are two teams I guess.

As we grew older, so too our ideologies. And I guess that's where we'd slowly see the foundations beneath us begin to shift, and in turn create new boundaries. These boundaries I like to think of are comparable to that board game Risk. Only there are no dice to determine outcomes, only our tolerance levels to help keep us in check and in our own space.

I love my brothers despite inevitable changes that happen over time. And it's not all bad I suppose, otherwise we wouldn't be living 10 minutes from each other.

#coilgratitudechallenge

_____________________

For $5 a month you could access exclusive content only for subscribers – blog and watch videos ad-free! Just click on this link to see all the amazing features available to you and get creating today!

For those of you with a subscription, check out more photographs of me with my brothers. You'll even get to see me as a 6 year old in my Superman costume!

Read more...

A Demigod must come to terms with her newly found powers and save mankind from Ares, the god of war, before it's too late.

Just when you think the superhero genre is about to end its cycle, along comes another to reignite the fires and burn bright. Wonder Woman is one of those that has shimmied and swayed around a tiring group of stale dance routines with panache and impeccable choreography.

While Marvel and Disney refused up to this point to acknowledge the immense presence of female directors and female led superhero films, Warner Brothers took the plunge and handed over for the first time in Hollywood film history a $100 million budget to a woman.

Her name is Patty Jenkins. She delivers an origin story for Diana Prince to unleash unto the world her superhero identity, Wonder Woman.

Theorised by Steve Neale, genre films need to reinvent themselves or else become stale and lose its audience. Difference is key to surviving, but you must not neglect your fan base either, so familiarity must be factored into the formula.

The same but different.

There are many ways in which you can add difference to a film, such as combining genres to create a hybrid. Another way is to explore atypical representations of characters according to the context of its time period.

In Wonder Woman, a female hero was very much long overdue. Despite film versions of Catwoman and Elektra, neither of those films explored their character through a female lens.

To apply further context, Hollywood is still very much a patriarchal institution. Films tend to be viewed from a male perspective with gratuitous shots of the female body.

From left to right: Dr. No; Star Trek into Darkness; Transformers (imagesacquired from IMDB)

Women's bodies are dismembered to accentuate their femininity and sexual prowess. They become items for male pleasure. There are plentiful more examples than of those shown in the strip. And even more so featured in advertisements.

The danger is it normalises how women should view themselves, and how men expect women to behave. It's a dangerous concoction that has contributed to a toxic environment in our society.

Coined in the 1970s as the 'male gaze' by theorist, Laura Mulvey, Hollywood has rarely shown any interest in equalising the gender balance. Despite some improvements with the acceleration of female driven action projects, until there are more women behind the camera, the representations of women will always be skewed.

THEMYSCIRA

The home world's of superheros are always a prerequisite of the genre, and Wonder Woman was to be no different, other than the fact this would be the first time anyone will have seen it, as envisioned by Jenkins.

The wide shot establishes the equilibrium of the film on the island. It depicts an unspoiled island free of men and lush with greenery. What is most important here is the representation of women.

They are warriors. They can do all that men can. And they are seen in full armour, wielding swords.

The medium close up shows us Diana as a young child. She looks down on the action while her elders train to protect the island from potential invaders.

The interesting aspect about the image is that it depicts a child who aspires to be like those she sees. This is key. Jenkins understands what it is for young girls in society today to have role models and behaviours to look up to. They must be positive ones, for our actions as adults leave an impression on our children. In this instance, we are offered a viewpoint from a female perspective, not one of a man.

The shot reverse shot has Steve Trevor (Chris Pine) sink into the abyss, staring up toward Diana. Notice how Diana is silhouetted by the light behind her to depict a halo-like effect? This is certainly a message of positivity, giving birth to her as a beacon of hope within the film.

The respective angles, high on Steve and low on Diana, positions their place as character types. One is in distress and the other is the rescuer.

Moments later, after Diana plucks Steve out from his predicament, the angles repeat the motif – Diana is viewed from a low angle to represent her as the dominant figure. The hero. Steve is shown from a high angle to depict his vulnerability.

Consider once more Neale's genre theory. Action films have familiar character types – heroes and damsels – clearly depicted by this scene. However, there is a difference from what we would expect and that is the hero being female and the damsel in distress is the male.

Even more interesting is to appreciate the casting. Chris Pine is very much the big name draw in the film – he has starred in countless films where he plays the lead. To position himself as the damsel once again flips the genre on its head to offer the spectator something different. And as such, gives us a film that is as much unique as it is entertaining. It is no wonder it succeeded commercially and critically.

A further nod to Neale's observations can be appreciated here whereby Diana intervenes to save Steve once more, this time from a bullet. Those of you eagle-eyed enough will notice this is a familiar scene first shown in Superman (Donner, 1978) where Clark Kent saves Lois in similar fashion.

NO MAN'S LAND

The following sequence is the first time we view Wonder Woman in full costume. It is a sequence worth exploring and one that offers us a long awaited representation for all young girls the world over to admire.

Diana pleads with Steve to cross No Man's Land. He is insistent that no man can cross it. It is a defeatist attitude – not of the hero we want when women and children are suffering. In as much as he would like to try, she accuses him of choosing to do nothing.

Diana chooses instead to do something. To be the hero the world needs. The colour grading changes in this, a significant moment, when she reveals herself as Wonder Woman. The palette is more vivid from the previous reverse shots of them arguing. We are entering a new realm. A realm where a woman is about to show the world what she is capable of.

Climbing out from the trenches, Jenkins chooses to show the spectator Wonder Woman's iconic costume – though dismembered, it is not to showcase the female body in terms of her sexuality, but to highlight instead the iconography associated with this superhero in the same vain we have become accustomed with Superman's logo.

This is such a glorious long shot. It has us view Wonder Woman as we would want of any hero. Walking into battle as a brave and courageous warrior.

Exploring the mise-en-scene and cinematography, you can see behind her the clouds have parted, as though to offer us a biblical reference to when Moses led the Israelites to safety after God parted the Red Sea.

Immediately as a result, we view Wonder Woman with God-like powers to position her as saviour to mankind.

The land all around her is desolate and dark. There's an absence of life, depicting destruction led by man. There are clear opposites at play here whereby man is viewed negatively and a destroyer of the world, and woman is shown to lead and usher in a new dawn for our times irrespective of the period the film is set in.

As Wonder Woman rushes across the muddied terrain, a series of low angles are inter-cut to reinforce the heroism and to signify to the spectator her as a beacon of aspiration.

The composition of the two shots position Wonder Woman as a protector, as she holds off the German onslaught . A long shot first shows her take a stand of defiance – she digs in to reveal a medium close up, as the intensity of the situation is supported through a rousing score by Rupert Gregson-Williams (a film's score is so important in supporting meaning, and this one I hope you search for and listen to).

The high angle on Wonder Woman taking on all the gunfire highlights not necessarily a vulnerability, but more to my mind, just what type of superhero she is. One that is fearless and trailblazing in a depiction of a female superhero not seen on the big screen before.

Jenkins' take on the genre is one that is unique and observes Neale's theory to a tee. We can't help but support the thrilling sequence of action with fist pumping fervour.

Patty Jenkins has an incredible vision for directing action. I bet there are far more women out there, in the industry today, and a generation of future female filmmakers who are chomping at the bit to be offered an opportunity to direct action driven genre films.

They deserve their chance to prove themselves in as much way as men have been offered to stake their claim to the genre.

Wonder Woman 1984 is scheduled for release on October 2020. You can check out the trailer by clicking the link on its title.

- All images except where indicated within the article are screen grabs taken from the film.

- Main banner image in header is from unsplash by Timothy Eberly

______________

You can follow me on Twitter @BurntEnds88

Click on the links to read more Film Archives posts:

Captain Fantastic (Ross, 2015)

Fight Club (Fincher, 1999)

L.A. Confidential (Hanson, 1997)

Shaun of the Dead (Wright, 2004)

Moon (Jones, 2009)

Double Indemnity (Wilder, 1944)

Subscribe for just $5 a month for exclusive content and never see advertisements blight your experience ever again!

So go ahead, just head to the Coil platform and get started today – click for the Coil link here.

For those of you with a subscription, check out the bonus content below.

Read more...

Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star: A 3 Year Old's Rendition