Non-Monetized Together #svalien

Decadeology

Jay Wennington/Unsplash

With music audiences being more fragmented than ever, some of you may be wondering if it’s possible for there to be any new music superstars anymore. 

I was curious about this as well, so I decided to visit chartmasters.org to find the most-subscribed musicians on Spotify and then only include musicians who first gained mainstream success no earlier than 2020. Here are the results, as of August 11, 2024:

1. Olivia Rodrigo — 38.3 million followers (29th overall)

2. Junior H — 17.8 million (109th overall)

3. Bizarrap — 15.9 million (127th overall)

4. Peso Pluma — 15.2 million (135th overall)

5. Grupo Firme — 13.0 million (163rd overall)

6. Mahalini — 12.9 million (165th overall)

7. Feid — 12.7 million (167th overall)

8. Carín León — 12.2 million (176th overall)

9. ENHYPEN — 9.4 million (277th overall)

10. Santa Fe Klan — 9.2 million (283th overall)

Article also available at https://medium.com/non-monetized-together/do-we-even-have-new-music-superstars-anymore-639cb11cecd7.

#Music #Trends #Spotify #Decadeology #Culture

Discuss...

So now that Nonmonetized Together is affiliated with the decadeology community, I’ve found it fit to write this article about older members who dismiss younger members’ perspectives. Some of the older members’ complaints don’t apply to younger people so it doesn’t make sense to tell the youth that their perspective is wrong.

This article could also be relevant to non-decadeologists if they participate in other online communities. But my examples in this article will be related to decadeology.

For example, the argument that “you can’t pin an era range down to a month” is ignorant of contemporary technology.

Back in the 90s, yes, this was true because only newsworthy events were documented. But you couldn’t track developing attitudes, cultural movements, and trends because these things evolved through mundane activities such as attendings events, talking to people, and buying things. Or to give even a more mundane example, just having a thought. Sometimes we have thoughts that change the way we live our lives.

But now these “unassuming” signs of cultural development are tracked on social media and timestamped down to the minute. Because of this, we can now follow the development of stories like the Capital storming or the ChatGPT developments in real time. Or we can see how political narratives develop. All of this is possible with the help of advanced search functions, trending feeds, and data such as Google Trends. This approach is used by KnowYourMeme to track memes and, yes, news stories as well.

Then there will be oldheads who will look at a thread that’s done in the style of “decadeology anarchy” and respond, “you sound weird even asking that question.” Which I would think most young users would already know, except maybe the very youngest users. The older members don’t see how the Internet has become the perfect spot for niche communities to form, and how newer niche communities differ from older ones.

Non-mainstream online communities have been a thing for as long as the Internet existed, but they really became a lot more commonplace and sustainable in the past few years. Now we’re at the point where it’s hard to even tell what counts as mainstream and what counts as underground. Everybody’s their own bubble. You couldn’t say that back in 2004.

Plus even the niche communities in the early days of the Internet were kind of uniform because most of them would consist of news, debates, artwork, surveys, rants, memes, discussions of the site itself, and an off-topic section. They could all be somewhat recognizable to outsiders.

Whereas here in 2024, the Internet could gather enough people to start r/decadeologyanarchy, a niche of a niche where people are free to abandon social conventions completely and make posts that would sound strange in real-life conversation, like year-by-year breakdowns or “images that give them the same vibes as 2014.”

So when you say, “that’s not a sane discussion topic,” you should know that this is the very reason that you’re seeing it on Reddit and not offline or on websites their IRL friends would see. This is also why the decadeology anarchy posts are appropriate for Nonmonetized Together, because it’s an environment where you can create your own social norms.

Then you have the comments that accuse people of being subjective. Like, they often show up whenever the community does year comparisons, or when they make a post about how good a year was, or when they make a post about how bad a year was. Sometimes in these cases, young people will be accused of bias for their opinions.

People fail to realize that the whole point of decadeology is to be subjective — that’s the difference between decadeology and history. It’s interesting to see other people’s personal subjective perspectives because we get to learn how they experience the world over the years.

So I am interested in the older members’ personal perspectives but it’s not fair to use that to attack other people’s perspectives. They’re no less biased than anybody else.

This article is also available at https://medium.com/non-monetized-together/some-of-the-older-members-of-the-decadeology-community-could-be-more-self-aware-f114804e2cae

Discuss...

#Internet #GettingOlder #OnlineCommunity #Decadeology #Reddit

You can also read this article at https://medium.com/non-monetized-together/feel-free-to-post-decadeology-anarchy-content-onto-nonmonetized-together-364336a7f412?source=friends_link&sk=9f54c4dd0f77e08837ec11a5dd2903f6.

In response to the news that r/decadeologyanarchy will go private once it reaches 500 members, I want to mention that if anybody wants to make a public post in the style of that subreddit, they can use Nonmonetized Together to do so.

Decadeology is a subject I’ve been fascinated by for years. It’s a term used to refer to Internet analysis of the evolution of society, technology, politics, and pop culture throughout the years. Where decadeology differs from general historical analysis is that a decadeologist usually limits their focus to decades they’ve lived through, basing their analysis on their own personal perceptions. Another difference is that people sometimes use decadeology to predict the future.

As you can see, decadeology isn’t a very academic method of analysis, but it was never intended to be. It’s just a fun way to explore different people’s ways of perceiving the world.

What a lot of people don’t realize is that up until a few months ago, decadeology used to be more geared towards hair-splitting. You would often see people grouping certain eras with super-specific cut-offs, often down to a year’s season. Or they would analyse really small shifts in society. Now, this wasn’t exclusively the case. Decadeology has always made room for broader analysis, but hypercategorization was a common feature of decadeology.

But lately, decadeology has gained a much wider audience, which has caused the hair-splitting to be pushed to the wayside in favour of more mainstream-focused discussions. Though, I enjoyed reading the in-depth posts that used to be popular. I liked them because they were more detailed and made the community less repetitive. A few people agree with me, and they congregate on r/decadeology’s sister subreddit, r/decadeologyanarchy, which is dedicated to preserving decadeology’s tradition of making hyperspecific posts.

Since I don’t have a Reddit account, I was disappointed to hear that r/decadeologyanarchy said they would go private at a certain point. One of the reasons I read Reddit is because of its convenience — you can see a lot of discussion without signing in. But I remembered that I run a non-paywalled platform that welcomes alternative and overlooked content — the one you are reading right now. Why don’t I designate Nonmonetized Together as a place where people can publicly make decadeology anarchy posts?

This does not mean that Nonmonetized Together will become a publication focused on decadeology anarchy. I will be regularly writing new articles on other subjects just like I always have. If you liked what I’ve been posting previously, you’ll also probably like what I will continue to post on the future. I’m just saying, anybody who wants to have a public discussion on the topic of decadeology anarchy can use this platform to do so.

Nonmonetized Together is available both on Medium and on a federated platform called write.as. Make sure to read Nonmonetized Together’s “about” page to get an understanding of what the community stands for, how it works, how to behave, etc. I have other articles that go further in depth on the things discussed on that “about” page. While it’s important to read the “about” page, these other articles aren’t really necessary to read, but they can help you understand this online environment better. Many of them are featured near the bottom of the “about” page on Medium and write.as.

Nevertheless, I’m not expecting everybody to understand everything about this publication right away. If you make a Nonmonetized Together post that suggests you don’t quite understand something about it, I’ll respond to the post and let you know.

If you feel overwhelmed with all this information, you can go here to find the articles I’ve posted to Medium, sorted by topic. Please note that the list “Issues that Nonmonetized Together can help solve” is comprised up of other people’s articles; all the other lists contain my own articles.

If you want to be added as a writer to Nonmonetized Together, make a Medium account and send me a private message or comment saying you want to be added. Then you will be able to post to the publication.

Discuss...

#Invitation #Writers #Reddit #WriteAs #Decadeology