SinBot

Limitless was about operating without constraints – of the world, of people, of everything.

It was about a modern-day, corrupted Jesus. A man who walked among us, whilst not being like us at all.

Why not.

Beyond thought, beyond conditioning, beyond attachment to concepts such as pleasure and pain.

Beyond labels, into right action.

I don't want shortcuts.

Honour.

Long-term, sustainable gains.

Enough talk of how to be a good man. Be one.

• Paraphrasing Marcus Aurelius

1. Kill cupid.
2. Automate essentials.
3. Reverse entropy.
4. Bear cross.

Triangle. Triangle with line. Upside down triangle with line. Upside down triangle.

The internet probably causes wide-scale narcissism.

End the idea of how-to masturbation.

Learn, do, iterate.

I'd like to create an impossible ideal.

I'm thinking about the Nietschzean Uberman, and also, a line Kobe said once. “Are you a different animal and the same beast?”

RIP.

Aesthetically pleasing. Low bodyfat. Facial symmetry. Greek physicality. An independent thinker, able to work within a network. Comfortable in solitude, and in crowds. A non-bullshit artist, speaking from the core – win, lose, or draw. An individual that swings for the fences. An individual with a breadth AND depth of knowledge, and the ability to apply said knowledge. Able to read, speak, and listen to 10 languages. Present. Able to act without attachment to this world.

That's the impossible ideal. We'll all fall short. But what would happen if you tried? You'll never know until you allow n to = 1.

1. Automate health/attractiveness.
2. Prioritise meaningful, needle-moving work.
3. Prioritise meaningful connection which takes place in-person.
4. Try hunter-gatherer lifestyle habits (in places where application is possible.)
5. Be responsible with your attractiveness, never lead women on, and only choose with the intention of exponential depth.
6. Be here now.

What if happiness was a lie we made up – a composite of lust, peace, bliss, or whatever other non-unpleasant emotions people felt.

Fundamentally I reckon man’s default position is discontent – which is why we need to come up with omnipotent men in the skies, capitalist fantasies, and whatever else to pretend that one day we’ll reach a point where the suffering stops – the happiness point.

But I think we’re wrong here – and the Buddhists were on to something. Life might basically be a steady stream of suffering (or at the very least a boring stream of consciousness) with a few oscillations resulting from unusually positive or negative experiences.

Something to chew on maybe.

Happiness has become a capitalist lie.

Ye gotta find it elsewhere – if it ever existed. I don't think it did. I think it was something we made up to maintain the species, nothing more, nothing less.